The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover
Abstract
This study examines mediated effects of perceived supervisor support (PSS) and perceived organizational support (POS) on turnover cognitions, and their interactive effects on turnover behavior in a sample of 225 social services workers. In this study, we address a seeming contradiction in current findings regarding support and attachments to managers versus attachments to the organization itself. The POS literature suggests fully mediated causal paths to turnover from POS and PSS, through affective commitment. Whereas, the commitment, LMX, and turnover literatures suggest alternative causal paths that imply broader effects for POS and PSS on turnover. Contrary to earlier POS literature, findings showed that PSS had independent effects on turnover cognitions not mediated through POS. Model tests also indicated that POS had significant effects on turnover mediated through normative commitment, as well as affective organizational commitment. Moreover, a new significant interactive relationship was discovered such that low PSS strengthened the negative relationship between POS and turnover, while high PSS weakened it. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804
Cited by
Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.002 · Cited by 466
Shen, J., Dumont, J., & Deng, X. (2018) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116664610 · Cited by 251
RetractedCharoensukmongkol, P., & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2021) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2020.1795613 · Cited by 182
Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.02.003 · Cited by 163
A Person‐Centred Perspective on Social Support in the Workplace
Caesens, G., Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Houle, S. A., & Stinglhamber, F. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12196 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1059-1075
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2053232321
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.472
- The paper
- Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.