Cited by 251Environmental Sustainability in BusinessJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Management

RETRACTED: Employees’ Perceptions of Green HRM and Non-Green Employee Work Outcomes: The Social Identity and Stakeholder Perspectives

Shen, Jie, Dumont, Jenny, Deng, Xin·2018·Group & Organization Management

Abstract

Green human resource management (green HRM) refers to a set of HRM practices that organizations adopt to improve employee workplace green performance. While the effect of perceived green HRM on employee workplace green performance has received some empirical support, its relationship with employee non-green workplace outcomes remains unexplored and, therefore, unknown. This research tests an integrative moderated-mediation model related to the relationship between perceived green HRM and non-green workplace outcomes including employee task performance, organizational citizenship behavior toward the organization (OCBO) and intention to quit, and the underlying mechanisms. Analyses of the multisourced data reveal that perceived green HRM influences these three non-green employee workplace outcomes through a motivational social and psychological process (i.e., organizational identification). Perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the effect of perceived green HRM on organizational identification and the indirect effect of perceived green HRM on the three employee workplace outcomes, via the mediation of organizational identification. This research advances our knowledge about the relationship between perceived green HRM and non-green employee workplace outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059601116664610This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, J., Dumont, J., & Deng, X.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Shen, Jie
Venue
Group & Organization Management
Published
2016-08-18
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
594-622
ISSN
  • 1059-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3993
OpenAlex
W2512317779
Cited by
251
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Group & Organization Management (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
green human resource management, employee task performance, turnover intention, organizational identification, perceived organizational support, social identity, stakeholder perspectives, moderated mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review