Cited by 522Ethics in Business and EducationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in medical practice

Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: the corporate ethical virtues model

Open access
Kaptein, Muel·2008·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Based on four interlocking empirical studies, this paper initially validates and refines the Corporate Ethical Virtues Model which formulates normative criteria for the ethical culture of organizations. The findings of an exploratory factor analysis provide support for the existence of eight unidimensional subscales: clarity, congruency of supervisors, congruency of management, feasibility, supportability, transparency, discussability, and sanctionability. The findings of a confirmatory factor analysis show that the overall fit of the model is quite high. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity is also found. The resulting 58‐item self‐reporting questionnaire is a useful tool that can be used in future research and by managers in assessing the ethical culture of their organization. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.520

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaptein, M.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Kaptein, Muel
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-10
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
923-947
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2132095008
Cited by
522
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ERIM Report Series Research in Management (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ERIM Report Series Research in Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
ethical organizational culture, moral virtues, scale development, organizational transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review