The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How retirees work: predictors of different types of bridge employment
Open accessAbstract
Employment after retirement, known as bridge employment, is expected to occur more frequently because the baby boom generation will increase the number of retirees. Little is known about which employees will obtain which type of bridge employment when they retire, even though it has important implications. The present study examined work‐related attitudes, job characteristics, and work‐related accomplishments of 171 retirees in order to predict whether they would fully retire or take one of two types of bridge jobs after retirement: Career‐consistent bridge jobs or bridge jobs in fields different from their original career. Continuity theory of retirement helped predict post‐retirement employment type. Retirees who had skills specifically related to their career job were more likely to work in a career‐related bridge job than either to fully retire or to take a bridge job that was not related to their careers; retirees who formerly held career jobs with intrinsically motivating job characteristics were more likely to take a career‐related bridge job than to retire fully, and retirees who had experienced work strain in their career job were more likely to take a bridge job not related to their former career than to take a career bridge job. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Cited by
Employee Retirement: A Review and Recommendations for Future Investigation
Wang, M., & Shultz, K. S. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309347957 · Cited by 850
Psychological Research on Retirement
Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115131 · Cited by 508
Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions
Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.014 · Cited by 317
Working after retirement: Features of bridge employment and research directions
Beehr, T. A., & Bennett, M. M. (2015) · Work, Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/wau007 · Cited by 309
Self-citationA meta‐analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation‐related behaviour
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12031 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Gobeski, K. T., & Beehr, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-425
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W1972975499
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How retirees work: predictors of different types of bridge employment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.547
- The paper
- Gobeski, K. T., & Beehr, T. A. (2009). How retirees work: predictors of different types of bridge employment. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.