Cited by 53Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFungal and yeast genetics research

Mikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Wachstumskinetik vonStreptomyces hygroscopicus

Schuhmann, Edith, Bergter, F.·1976·Zeitschrift für allgemeine Mikrobiologie

Abstract

Growth kinetics, branch formation, and cytological properties of mycelial growth of Streptomyces hygroscopicus on solid media were investigated by phase-contrast microscopy using a microculture method. Measurements were made on taken photographs of the growing hyphae from the beginning of spore germination up to maximal 18 hours. The specific growth rate of the germ tube was much higher than the specific growth rate of the mycelium. The doubling time of the total length of the mycelial hyphae and the doubling time of branch formation was quite the same for the period investigated. After a short time of outgrowth each individual hypha grows at a constant rate, i.e. the length increases linearly, but the growth kinetics of the whole mycelium becomes exponentially by branching. It seems, that nucleoids only divide in that part of a hypha between the tip and the nearest branch. A cell unit (1.4-1.9 mum on different media) could be calculated by the length of a hypha and the number of nucleoids. A hypha is growing with the cell unit at the tip or with the polar cap only. No interkalary growth in length could be found. Branches were formed only up to about 100 mum from the tip on complex medium and up to about 50 mum from the tip on mineral salt medium. A simple method of mycelial growth has been developed. Some properties showing the connection between Streptomycetes and prokaryotic organisms on one hand and hyphal growing fungi on the other hand are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jobm.3630160305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Actual growth and rapamycin production kinetic parameters for S. hygroscopicus were not determined.

    “Though an attempt was made by Schuhmann and Bergter investigating the branch formation, and cytological properties of mycelial growth of Streptomyces hygroscopicus on solid media (Schuhmann and Bergter 1976), the actual growth and rapamycin production kinetic parameters were not determined.”

    From Kinetics of rapamycin production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus MTCC 4003 (2014) · cites this paper as Schuhmann and Bergter 1976

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 53

Authors
Schuhmann, E., & Bergter, F.
Venue
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Mikrobiologie
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1976
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
201-215
ISSN
  • 0233-111X (ISSN-L)
  • 0044-2208
  • 1521-4028
OpenAlex
W3026216931
Cited by
53
References
27
Citations by year
2013: 1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Basic Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Streptomyces hygroscopicus, hyphal branching, germ tube, intercalary growth, spore germination, Streptomyces
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Kinetics, Models, Biological, Streptomyces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review