Cited by 26Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFluid Dynamics and Mixing

Kinetics of rapamycin production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus MTCC 4003

Open access
Dutta, Subhasish, Basak, Bikram, Bhunia, Biswanath, Chakraborty, Samayita, Dey, Apurba·2014·3 Biotech

Abstract

Research work was carried out to describe the kinetics of cell growth, substrate consumption and product formation in batch fermentation of rapamycin using shake flask as well as laboratory-scale fermentor. Fructose was used as the sole carbon source in the fermentation media. Optimization of fermentation parameters and reliable mathematical models were used for the maximum production of rapamycin from Streptomyces hygroscopicus MTCC 4003. The experimental data for microbial production of rapamycin fitted well with the proposed mathematical models. Kinetic parameters were evaluated using best fit unstructured models, viz. Andrew’s model, Monod model, Yano model, Aiba model. Andrew’s model showed a comparatively better R 2 value (0.9849) among all tested models. The values of maximum specific growth rate ( μ max ), saturation constant ( K S ), inhibition constant ( K i ), and growth yield coefficient ( Y X/S ) were found to be 0.008 (h −1 ), 2.835 (g/L), 0.0738 (g/L), and 0.1708 (g g −1) , respectively. The optimum production of rapamycin was obtained at 300 rpm agitation and 1 vvm aeration rate in the fermentor. The final production of rapamycin in shake flask was 539 mg/L. Rapamycin titer found in bioreactor was 1,316 mg/L which is 52 % higher than the latest maximum value reported in the literature.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study describes batch rapamycin production by *Streptomyces hygroscopicus* MTCC 4003 with fructose as the sole carbon source and fits unstructured growth models to the data. Andrew’s substrate-inhibition model fit best (R² = 0.9849), and a 2.2-L bioreactor run reached 1,316 mg/L rapamycin, reported as 52% higher than the prior maximum cited.

Key findings

  • Fructose gave the highest rapamycin titer among glucose, fructose, mannose, and fructose + mannose; shake-flask production reached 539 mg/L.
  • Andrew’s model fit best (R² = 0.9849) with μmax = 0.0083 h⁻¹, KS = 2.835 g/L, and Ki = 0.073 g/L; Monod gave a lower R² = 0.8713 with μmax = 0.003869 h⁻¹ and KS = 0.8271 g/L. The abstract reports μmax = 0.008 h⁻¹, KS = 2.835 g/L, Ki = 0.0738 g/L, and YX/S = 0.1708 g g⁻¹; the results text reports average YX/S = 0.107 g g⁻¹, ranging from 0.0598 to 0.1708.
  • In the bioreactor at 300 rpm and 1 vvm, rapamycin reached 1,316.02 mg/L at 144 h, with maximum productivity of 9.13 mg/L h⁻¹; this was 52% higher than the previously reported 860.6 mg/L (Zou and Li 2013). By the 12th day, rapamycin decreased to 91.67 mg/L.
  • Rapamycin production started after 24 h and peaked at 144 h; dissolved oxygen was maintained at 10% saturation during fermentation.

Methods

  • Batch fermentations used *S. hygroscopicus* MTCC 4003 in 250-mL shake flasks (50 mL medium, 25 °C, 120 rpm, 7 days) and in a 2.2-L stirred tank reactor (2-L working volume, 25 °C, 300 rpm, 1 vvm, pH 7.24, 7 days), with fructose as the sole supplemented carbon source in further studies.
  • Biomass was measured as dry weight; residual fructose was measured by DNS; rapamycin was assayed by paper-disc agar diffusion against *Candida albicans* MTCC 227 and by HPLC (C18 column, methanol:acetonitrile 80:20, 272 nm). All experiments were performed in triplicate.
  • Growth kinetics were fitted to Monod, Andrew, Yano, and Aiba models using GraphPad Prism 5; YX/S was calculated from experimental data.

Limitations

  • Stated: substrate utilization analysis assumed supplemented carbohydrates were the sole carbon and energy source, neglecting carbohydrates present in other medium constituents such as malt extract.
  • Stated: because no product inhibition for rapamycin production was reported, only substrate inhibition was considered in modeling.
  • Evident: the kinetic and production conclusions come from one strain and lab-scale batch shake-flask/2.2-L bioreactor experiments; no fed-batch or larger-scale validation is reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13205-013-0189-2

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    The bioreactor rapamycin titer is 52% higher than the latest maximum value reported in the literature.

    “which is 52 % higher than the latest maximum value reported in the literature.”
    • Also stated in: § Results and discussion · plain
      “It is 52 % higher than that reported previously (860.6 mg/L) by Zou and Li (2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zou and Li 2013 source

      Table 5 (shown under Conclusion; page unavailable) lists 860.6 mg/l for this study and 783 mg/l as the highest titer among the earlier studies it compares. That is about 10% higher, not 52%. The Results section reports a different comparison: 182% higher than this study’s control. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Formation of two adjacent peaks in the HPLC chromatogram on the 12th day might be attributed to degradation of rapamycin and consequent production of rapamycin degradation products.

    “formation of two adjacent peaks in the HPLC chromatogram might be attributed to degradation of rapamycin and consequent production of rapamycin degradation products (Prapagdee et al. 2008; Wang et al. 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Prapagdee et al. 2008 source

      The Results and Discussion passage on metabolite stability describes unknown thermostable antifungal compounds, not rapamycin degradation. Searches of our untruncated copy for rapamycin, HPLC chromatograms, adjacent peaks, and day 12 found no passage addressing the proposed explanation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wang et al. 1994 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The decrease in rapamycin concentration on the 12th day might be attributed to rapamycin degrading after 7 days of fermentation.

    “This phenomenon was observed by Xu et al. (2005) and might be attributed to the fact that rapamycin starts degrading after 7 days of fermentation (Prapagdee et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Xu et al. 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Prapagdee et al. 2008 source

      The Results and Discussion section reports that antifungal activity decreased as fungal incubation continued, but it does not identify the metabolite as rapamycin or discuss its degradation. Searches for rapamycin degradation after seven days and concentration on day 12 found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    The experimental data for microbial production of rapamycin fitted well with the proposed mathematical models.

    “The experimental data for microbial production of rapamycin fitted well with the proposed mathematical models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The maximum specific growth rate (μmax) was found to be 0.008 h−1.

    “The values of maximum specific growth rate (μmax), saturation constant (KS), inhibition constant (Ki), and growth yield coefficient (YX/S) were found to be 0.008 (h−1), 2.835 (g/L), 0.0738 (g/L), and 0.1708 (g g−1), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 4
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    YX/S was fairly constant up to fructose concentration of 0.548 g/L and then decreased to minimal at fructose concentration of 27 g/L.

    “The average YX/S value was calculated to be 0.107 g g−1 and was fairly constant up to fructose concentration of 0.548 g/L and then decreased to minimal at fructose concentration of 27 g/L.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Substrate used for product formation and cell maintenance is negligible.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Fructose is consumed for cell growth and cell maintenance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Rapamycin production increased rapidly during end of the exponential phase and early stationary phase.

    “Rapamycin production was observed to increase rapidly during end of the exponential phase and early stationary phase (Xu et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xu et al. 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the carbohydrates used, fructose yielded the highest rapamycin titer, better than mannose.

    “It can be seen in Fig. 1, among the carbohydrates used fructose yielded highest rapamycin titer.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
      “Fructose was found to be a better carbon source than mannose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The dissolved oxygen level was maintained at 10% of saturation level all the time.

    “Finally, the DO level was maintained at 10 % of saturation level all the time (Zhu et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhu et al. 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The production of rapamycin started after 24 h of incubation and reached a maximal at 144 h.

    “The production of rapamycin was started after 24 h of incubation and reached a maximal at 144 h (Fig. 3a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Rapamycin is an antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus.

    “Rapamycin, also known as sirolimus, is an antibiotic commonly used as a potent antifungal and immunosuppressant drug produced by the soilborne actinomycete Streptomyces hygroscopicus (Fang and Demain 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fang and Demain 1995 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All experiments were performed in triplicate.

    “All the experiments were performed in triplicate.”
    • Also stated in: § Analytical procedures · plain
      “All experiments were done in triplicate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    YX/S was maximal at lower S and minimal at higher S because of substrate inhibition on YX/S.

    “Its values ranged from 0.0598 to 0.1708 and were found to be maximal at lower S and minimal at higher S because of the substrate inhibition on YX/S.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Substrate used for product formation and cell maintenance is negligible.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Fructose is consumed for cell growth and cell maintenance.
8 of 8
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Substrate used for product formation and cell maintenance is negligible.

    “However, if the substrate used for product formation and cell maintenance is assumed to be negligible, Eq (4) can be written as:5”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Supplemented carbohydrates are the sole source of carbon and energy, and the amount of carbohydrate present in other media constituents is negligible.

    “Hence, analysis of substrate utilization was done by assuming supplemented carbohydrates as sole source of carbon and energy, thereby neglecting the amount of carbohydrate present in other media constituents.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Fructose is consumed for cell growth and cell maintenance.

    “It is assumed that fructose is consumed for cell growth and cell maintenance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no product inhibition for rapamycin production.

    “Since, there was no report of product inhibition for rapamycin production, the effect of substrate inhibition was only considered for modeling.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Sixth-day HPLC chromatogram is assigned to conflicting figures

    Minor

    The text calls Figure 3c the sixth-day HPLC chromatogram, while the Figure 4 caption assigns that analysis to Figure 4c; Figure 3 is captioned as a time-course profile.

  • Fermentor cultivation duration is given as both seven and eight days

    Minor

    The methods specify seven days of fermentor cultivation, whereas the results say it was operated for eight consecutive days.

  • Growth yield coefficient is reported as its maximum rather than its average

    Minor

    The abstract reports YX/S as 0.1708 g g−1, but the results identify 0.1708 as the maximum and give the average as 0.107 g g−1.

  • Concentration calculation cites the time-course figure instead of the calibration figure

    Minor

    The paper says the concentration was calculated from an equation in Figure 3a, but identifies Figure 4a as the HPLC calibration curve used to calculate concentrations.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kumar CG, Malik RK, Tiwari MP, Jany KD (1999) Optimal production of Bacillus alkaline protease using a cheese whey medium. Microbiologie des Alimentes et Nutr 17:39–48
  2. Sallam L, El-Refai A, Osman M (2010) Some physiological factors affecting rapamycin production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus ATCC 29253. J Am Sci 6(6):188–194

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutta, S., Basak, B., Bhunia, B., Chakraborty, S., & Dey, A.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Durgapur (IN)
  • National Institute of Technology Agartala (IN)
Corresponding author
Dey, Apurba
Venue
3 Biotech
Published
2013-12-01
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
523-531
ISSN
  • 2190-572X (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5738
OpenAlex
W2085344350
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • 3 Biotech (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Keywords
Streptomyces hygroscopicus, batch fermentation kinetics, unstructured kinetic model, Monod kinetics, fructose carbon source, fermentation parameter optimization, shake flask fermentation, bioreactor scale-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review