Cited by 326Urban Heat Island MitigationWind and Air Flow StudiesBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

Urban shading—a design option for the tropics? A study in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Emmanuel, R., Rosenlund, H., Johansson, E.·2007·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

Recent urban microclimate studies in Colombo, Sri Lanka, indicate that the maximum daily temperature within street canyons decreases with increasing height to width (H/W) ratio, but higher H/W ratio negatively affects street‐level wind flow. There is also evidence pointing to the cooling effect of sea breeze. The nocturnal heat island is small in contrast to daytime urban–rural differences. In this paper, we use the software ENVI‐met to simulate the effect of different urban design options on air and surface temperatures, as well as on outdoor thermal comfort. The latter is expressed as the physiologically equivalent temperature (PET), an index based on air and radiant temperatures as well as wind and humidity. It is found that high albedo at street level gives the lowest air temperature during daytime, although the reduction is only about 1 °C. The lowest daytime mean radiant temperatures result from high H/W ratios of streets. This has a positive effect on thermal comfort; the increase of H/W ratio from about 1 to 3 leads to a decrease in PET by about 10 °C. Differences in air and surface temperatures, as well as PET, are small during the night. The results show that strategies that lead to better air temperature mitigation may not necessarily lead to better thermal comfort. However, shade enhancement through increased H/W ratios is clearly capable of significant reductions in PET, and thus, improved outdoor thermal comfort. Consequently, a critical urban design task in the humid tropics will be to guide the rapid urban growth towards efficient ‘shade growth’. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.1609

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emmanuel, R., Rosenlund, H., & Johansson, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Moratuwa (LK)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Emmanuel, R.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-05
Volume
27
Issue
14
Pages
1995-2004
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W1996187877
Cited by
326
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
urban shading, urban microclimate, outdoor thermal comfort, physiological equivalent temperature, surface albedo, mean radiant temperature, urban heat island, ENVI-met simulation, urban design, humid tropics, Colombo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review