Cited by 302Hydrology and Drought AnalysisClimate variability and modelsPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Frequency, duration and severity of drought in the Semiarid Northeast Brazil region.

Brito, S. S. B., Cunha, A. P. M. A., Cunningham, C. C., Alvalá, R. C., Marengo, J. A., Carvalho, M. A.·2018·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

Drought is the natural disaster that impacts the greatest number of people and produces the most significant economic losses. This work presents a quantitative assessment of drought events occurred in the Semiarid region of Northeast Brazil during 1981–2016. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of drought intensity for the last 36 years, analysing their severity, frequency and duration, considering hydro‐meteorological and agricultural aspects. To evaluate these two aspects, the 12‐month standardized precipitation index and the vegetation health index were considered to investigate drought characteristics. The definition of drought event for both these indices was performed regarding start and end month. In this context, drought duration is considered equal to the number of months of event, drought frequency is the number of events per time period and the drought severity is the absolute value of integral area below zero. Results show that the most severe and prolonged drought occurred in 2011–2016. In a clear contrast to previous droughts in past decades, during these last 5‐years period drought were more frequent, severe and affected a larger area with significant impacts for population, as well as economical activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.5225

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During 2011-2016, Northeast Brazil experienced its most severe and prolonged drought since 1981.

    “During 2011-2016, Northeast Brazil experienced its most severe and prolonged drought since 1981 (Brito et al., 2018).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Brito et al., 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brito, S. S. B., Cunha, A. P. M. A., Cunningham, C. C., Alvalá, R. C., Marengo, J. A., & Carvalho, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais (BR)
  • National Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters São José dos Campos SP Brazil
Corresponding author
Brito, S. S. B.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-17
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
517-529
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2750034635
Cited by
302
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (300080/2016‐6, 370458/2017‐6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
drought, drought frequency, drought duration, drought severity, Standardized Precipitation Index, vegetation health index, agricultural drought

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review