Methodological application of quantile mapping to generate precipitation data over Northwest Himalaya
Abstract
Continuous high quality data are critical for weather and climate investigations. Numerous data gaps exist particularly over mountainous regions which limits the ability to construct climatologies and perform trend analysis. This study addresses the issue of sparse precipitation data over Northwest Himalaya (NWH) and fills data voids by applying the quantile mapping (QM) method. QM is applied to observed winter precipitation for a period of 25 years (1991–1992 to 2015–2016) to construct a continuous reliable data set. The first 20 years (1991–1992 to 2010–2011) are used for training and the remaining 5 years (2011–2012 to 2015–2016) are used for validation. In total, 10 stations are available for this study and each one is considered serially as a reference to generate daily precipitation values at the other stations. The mean precipitation of NWH region is constructed by considering the mean of all the stations. Standard statistical measures like root mean square errors, standard deviation, skill score and its decompositions are applied to evaluate the generated datasets. Based on statistical analysis, the Kanzalwan station, located in Great Himalaya range, is one of the best performing reference stations for generating precipitation values over NWH. The statistical measures of this station show the highest skill scores, lowest root mean square error and lowest standard mean errors for all winter months except January. This study provides a successful application of QM to generate precipitation data for climate analysis over the complex terrain of the Himalaya region.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantile mapping performs well in estimating missing station data.
“Quantile mapping (QM) is widely used to correct biases in meteorological data (Maraun, 2013; Cannon et al., 2015), and it performs well in estimating missing station data (Simolo et al., 2010; Newman et al., 2015, 2019; Devi et al., 2019).”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Devi et al., 2019
Cites
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., & Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., & Whitfield, P. H. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Devi, U., Shekhar, M. S., Singh, G. P., Rao, N. N., & Bhatt, U. S.
- Affiliations
- Snow & Avalanche Study Estt (IN)
- Banaras Hindu University (IN)
- University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
- Corresponding author
- Devi, Usha
- Venue
- International Journal of Climatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-17
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3160-3170
- ISSN
- 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0088
- OpenAlex
- W2910382425
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey (G17AC00213)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- quantile mapping, northwestern Himalaya, winter precipitation, complex terrain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review