Cited by 15Precipitation Measurement and AnalysisClimate variability and modelsHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Methodological application of quantile mapping to generate precipitation data over Northwest Himalaya

Devi, Usha, Shekhar, Manorama S., Singh, Gyan P., Rao, Nalamasu N., Bhatt, Uma S.·2019·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

Continuous high quality data are critical for weather and climate investigations. Numerous data gaps exist particularly over mountainous regions which limits the ability to construct climatologies and perform trend analysis. This study addresses the issue of sparse precipitation data over Northwest Himalaya (NWH) and fills data voids by applying the quantile mapping (QM) method. QM is applied to observed winter precipitation for a period of 25 years (1991–1992 to 2015–2016) to construct a continuous reliable data set. The first 20 years (1991–1992 to 2010–2011) are used for training and the remaining 5 years (2011–2012 to 2015–2016) are used for validation. In total, 10 stations are available for this study and each one is considered serially as a reference to generate daily precipitation values at the other stations. The mean precipitation of NWH region is constructed by considering the mean of all the stations. Standard statistical measures like root mean square errors, standard deviation, skill score and its decompositions are applied to evaluate the generated datasets. Based on statistical analysis, the Kanzalwan station, located in Great Himalaya range, is one of the best performing reference stations for generating precipitation values over NWH. The statistical measures of this station show the highest skill scores, lowest root mean square error and lowest standard mean errors for all winter months except January. This study provides a successful application of QM to generate precipitation data for climate analysis over the complex terrain of the Himalaya region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.6008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantile mapping performs well in estimating missing station data.

    “Quantile mapping (QM) is widely used to correct biases in meteorological data (Maraun, 2013; Cannon et al., 2015), and it performs well in estimating missing station data (Simolo et al., 2010; Newman et al., 2015, 2019; Devi et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devi, U., Shekhar, M. S., Singh, G. P., Rao, N. N., & Bhatt, U. S.
Affiliations
  • Snow & Avalanche Study Estt (IN)
  • Banaras Hindu University (IN)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Corresponding author
Devi, Usha
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-17
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
3160-3170
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2910382425
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Climatology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey (G17AC00213)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
quantile mapping, northwestern Himalaya, winter precipitation, complex terrain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review