Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A regional frequency analysis of United Kingdom extreme rainfall from 1961 to 2000

Open access
Fowler, H. J., Kilsby, C. G.·2003·International Journal of Climatology

Abstract

Multi‐day rainfall events are an important cause of recent severe flooding in the UK, and any change in the magnitude of such events may have severe impacts upon urban structures such as dams, urban drainage systems and flood defences and cause failures to occur. Regional pooling of 1‐, 2‐, 5‐ and 10‐day annual maxima for 1961 to 2000 from 204 sites across the UK is used in a standard regional frequency analysis to produce generalized extreme value growth curves for long return‐period rainfall events for each of nine defined climatological regions. Temporal changes in 1‐, 2‐, 5‐ and 10‐day annual maxima are examined with L‐moments using both a 10 year moving window and the fixed decades of 1961–70, 1971–80, 1981–90 and 1991–2000. A bootstrap technique is then used to assess uncertainty in the fitted decadal growth curves and to identify significant trends in both distribution parameters and quantile estimates. There has been a two‐part change in extreme rainfall event occurrence across the UK from 1961 to 2000. Little change is observed at 1 and 2 days duration, but significant decadal‐level changes are seen in 5‐ and 10‐day events in many regions. In the south of the UK, growth curves have flattened and 5‐ and 10‐day annual maxima have decreased during the 1990s. However, in the north, the 10‐day growth curve has steepened and annual maxima have risen during the 1990s. This is particularly evident in Scotland. The 50 year event in Scotland during 1961–90 has become an 8‐year, 11‐year and 25‐year event in the East, South and North Scotland pooling regions respectively during the 1990s. In northern England the average recurrence interval has also halved. This may have severe implications for design and planning practices in flood control. Copyright © 2003 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joc.943

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Fowler, H. J., & Kilsby, C. G.
Venue
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-06
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1313-1334
ISSN
  • 0899-8418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0088
OpenAlex
W2052932530
Cited by
351
References
22
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A regional frequency analysis of United Kingdom extreme rainfall from 1961 to 2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/joc.943
The paper
Fowler, H. J., & Kilsby, C. G. (2003). A regional frequency analysis of United Kingdom extreme rainfall from 1961 to 2000. International Journal of Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.943

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.