Cited by 330Digital Transformation in IndustryProduct Development and CustomizationSustainable Supply Chain Management

The digitalization of operations and supply chain management: Theoretical and methodological implications

Open access
Holmström, Jan, Holweg, Matthias, Lawson, Benn, Pil, Frits K., Wagner, Stephan M.·2019·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

Abstract The digitalization of intra‐ and inter‐organizational processes offers significant opportunity for research in the field of operations and supply chain management (OSCM). This essay summarizes the contributions of the special issue articles, highlighting their focus on additive manufacturing and the encapsulation of design and production information in a digital artifact. We conceptualize the digital artifact as containing the digital genes of the associated physical object. Digital encapsulation thus involves the integration of product design information with additional information on how that design is to be translated into a physical object, delivered to the customer, and used. Building on insights from the special issue articles, we identify three pathways by which digital encapsulation affects OSCM practice, as well as theory elaboration and extension. First, digital encapsulation allows each unique digitally encapsulated artifact to be acted on independently by OSCM systems. Second, digital encapsulation enables the redistribution of activities across organizational and geographic landscapes. Third, digital encapsulation facilitates interactivity of the digital artifact with external environment inputs. We conclude with a number of directions for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/joom.1073

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 330

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 35(1), 9-30.
  2. Roscoe, S., Cousins, P., & Handfield, R. (2019). The micro- foundations of an operational capability in digital manufactur- ing. Journal of Operations Management, 65(8), 774-793.

Authors
Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Lawson, B., Pil, F. K., & Wagner, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Pil, Frits K.
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
728-734
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W2993834601
Cited by
330
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 11
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
digitalization, supply chain management, operations management, additive manufacturing, digital artifacts, digital twin, inter-organizational processes, theory extension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review