The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage
Open accessAbstract
We measured the in situ biomechanical properties of knee joint cartilage from five species (bovine, canine, human, monkey, and rabbit) to examine the biomechanical relevance of animal models of human knee joint injuries and osteoarthritis. In situ biphasic creep indentation experiments were performed to simultaneously determine all three intrinsic material coefficients (aggregate modulus, Poisson's ratio, and permeability) of the cartilage as represented by the linear KLM biphasic model. In addition, we also assessed the effects of load bearing on these intrinsic properties at “high” and “low” weight‐bearing regions on the distal femur. Our results indicate that significant differences exist in some of these material properties among species and sites. The aggregate modulus of the anterior patellar groove within each species is the lowest among all sites tested, and the permeability of the patellar groove cartilage is the highest and does not vary among species. Similarly, the Poisson's ratio in the patellar groove is the lowest in all species, except in the rabbit. These results lead to the conclusion that patellar groove cartilage can undergo greater and faster compression. Thus, under high compressive loads, the cartilage of the patellar groove surface can more rapidly compress to create a congruent patellofemoral joint articulation. For any given location, no differences were found in the aggregate modulus among all the species, and no correlation was found between aggregate modulus and thickness at the test site. Thus, in the process of selecting a suitable experimental animal model of human articular cartilage, it is essential to consider the significant interspecies differences of the mechanical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering
Temenoff, J. S., & Mikos, A. G. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00108-3 · Cited by 554
Antigen removal for the production of biomechanically functional, xenogeneic tissue grafts
Cissell, D. D., Hu, J. C., Griffiths, L. G., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.041 · Cited by 52
Self-citationComputational aspects in mechanical modeling of the articular cartilage tissue
Mohammadi, H., Mequanint, K., & Herzog, W. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0954411912470239 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Athanasiou, K. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., Buckwalter, J. A., Malinin, T. I., & Mow, V. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 330-340
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2005150459
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100090304
- The paper
- Athanasiou, K. A., Rosenwasser, M. P., Buckwalter, J. A., Malinin, T. I., & Mow, V. C. (1991). Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100090304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.