The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage
Abstract
The deformation behavior and mechanical properties of articular chondrocytes are believed to play an important role in their response to mechanical loading of the extracellular matrix. This study utilized the micropipette aspiration test to measure the viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes isolated from macroscopically normal or end‐stage osteoarthritic cartilage. A three‐parameter standard linear solid was used to model the viscoelastic behavior of the cells. Significant differences were found between the mechanical properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. Specifically, osteoarthritic chondrocytes exhibited a significantly higher equilibrium modulus (0.33 ± 0.23 compared with 0.24 ± 0.11 kPa), instantaneous modulus (0.63 ± 0.51 compared with 0.41 ± 0.17 kPa), and apparent viscosity (5.8 ± 6.5 compared with 3.0 ± 1.8 kPa‐s) compared with chondrocytes isolated from macroscopically normal, nonosteoarthritic cartilage. The elastic moduli and relaxation time constant determined experimentally in this study were used to estimate the apparent biphasic properties of the chondrocyte on the basis of the equation for the gel relaxation time of a biphasic material. The differences in viscoelastic properties may reflect alterations in the structure and composition of the chondrocyte cytoskeleton that have previously been associated with osteoarthritic cartilage. Coupled with earlier theoretical models of cell‐matrix interactions in articular cartilage, the increased elastic and viscous properties suggest that the mechanical environment of the chondrocyte may be altered in osteoarthritic cartilage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanical models for living cells—a review
Lim, C. T., Zhou, E. H., & Quek, S. T. (2006) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.008 · Cited by 719
Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases
Lee, G. Y. H., & Lim, C. T. (2007) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.01.005 · Cited by 485
Self-citationHuman cardiac organoids for the modelling of myocardial infarction and drug cardiotoxicity
Richards, D. J., Li, Y., Kerr, C. M., Yao, J., Beeson, G. C., Coyle, R. C., Chen, X., Jia, J., Damon, B., Wilson, R., et al. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-0539-4 · Cited by 439
Kreuz, P. C., Erggelet, C., Steinwachs, M. R., Krause, S. J., Lahm, A., Niemeyer, P., Ghanem, N., Uhl, M., & Südkamp, N. (2006) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.020 · Cited by 381
GUILAK, F., ALEXOPOULOS, L. G., UPTON, M. L., YOUN, I., CHOI, J. B., CAO, L., SETTON, L. A., & HAIDER, M. A. (2006) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1346.011 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Trickey, W. R., Lee, G. M., & Guilak, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 891-898
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2080636405
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100180607
- The paper
- Trickey, W. R., Lee, G. M., & Guilak, F. (2000). Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.