Cited by 56Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

The central ACL defect as a model for failure of intra‐articular healing

Open access
Spindler, K.P., Murray, M.M., Devin, C., Nanney, L.B., Davidson, J.M.·2006·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Intra‐articular soft tissues, such as the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), fail to heal in contrast to the extra‐articular medial collateral ligament (MCL), which undergoes classic healing. The goal of this study was to validate a model for failure of intra‐articular healing that could be used in the future to test new repair strategies. We conducted a two‐part experiment, the first part ex vivo, and the second in vivo. Our initial ex vivo experiments were used to determine the optimal width of the central defect in the canine ACL that would produce reproducible structural properties at time zero. The second experimental series used this optimal scalpel blade width to create a central defect in the canine ACL followed by measurement of structural properties in the ACL after either a 3‐ or 6‐week in vivo healing period. A 3.5‐mm beaver blade resulted in a maximum tolerated load of 56.8 ± 4.7% (mean ± SEM) of control at time zero. After the 3‐ and 6‐week in vivo healing periods, the maximum load was 74.6 ± 5.3 at 3 weeks and 64.9 ± 3.8% at 6 weeks compared to control. Thus, biomechanical parameters tested at 6 weeks after creation of a defect showed no significant gains from defects tested immediately after the creation of injury. The centrally placed ACL defect in this canine model demonstrates failure to mechanically heal, which should prove suitable for future in vivo evaluation of the biomechanical and histological response to tissue engineering repair strategies for intra‐articular soft tissues. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:401–406, 2006

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20074

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spindler, K. P., Murray, M. M., Devin, C., Nanney, L. B., & Davidson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Spindler, K.P.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
401-406
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W1977262979
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vanderbilt University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament, canine model, ligament biomechanics, medial collateral ligament
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Elasticity, Stifle, Stress, Mechanical, Wound Healing, Reproducibility of Results, Range of Motion, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review