Cited by 175Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Collagen-platelet composite enhances biomechanical and histologic healing of the porcine anterior cruciate ligament

Open access
Joshi, Shilpa M., Mastrangelo, Ashley N., Magarian, Elise M., Fleming, Braden C., Murray, Martha M.·2009·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fails to heal after traumatic rupture. Furthermore, large-animal models have recently shown that 1-month functional ACL healing is augmented after suture repair when a bioactive scaffold is placed in the tear site. Hypothesis: At the time of suture repair, placement of a bioactive scaffold in the ACL wound site would improve the structural properties of the tissue. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-seven knees in immature pigs underwent ACL transection and suture repair. A collagen-platelet composite (CPC) was used to supplement the repair in 14 knees. Knees were harvested at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Mechanical testing and histologic analysis were performed. Results: The addition of a CPC to a suture repair resulted in improvements in yield load and linear stiffness of the repair tissue at 3 months, as well as a significant increase in cell density. A reduction in yield load and stiffness occurred at the 6-week time point in both groups, a phase when revascularization was noted. Conclusion: The addition of a CPC to a suture repair enhanced the structural properties of the ACL, and the improvement was associated with increased cellularity within the healing ligament. Clinical Relevance: The addition of a bioactive scaffold to the wound site improved the functional healing of the ACL after suture repair. The decreased repair strength during revascularization may indicate a need to protect the repair site through this period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546509339915

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an immature pig model of repaired ACL, the PRP group showed increased cellularity of the healing ligament with fusiform-shaped cells and decreased vascularity compared to controls at 3 months.

    “After 3 months, the PRP group showed increased cellularity of the healing ligament with fusiform-shaped cells and decreased vascularity compared to controls.”

    From Molecular and Biologic Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Ligament and Tendon Healing and Regeneration: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Results (Histomorphometry) report 25.5% higher cellularity and a higher proportion of fusiform cells in the collagen-platelet composite (CPC) group at 3 months. They also state that vascularity decreased in both groups, with no significant difference between them; the claimed decrease compared with controls is not supported. The treatment was CPC, not PRP alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, S. M., Mastrangelo, A. N., Magarian, E. M., Fleming, B. C., & Murray, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Martha M.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2009-11-25
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
2401-2410
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2164473845
Cited by
175
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR054099, AR052772, R01AR052772)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament, ligament healing, suture repair, bioactive scaffolds, ligament biomechanics, yield load, stiffness, revascularization, cell density, porcine model, ligament rupture
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Blood Platelets, Collagen, Random Allocation, Wound Healing, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Treatment Outcome, Platelet Transfusion, Models, Animal, Sus scrofa, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review