Cited by 14Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Novel Methodology for Predicting Photogenotoxic Risk of Pharmaceutical Substances Based on Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and DNA-Binding Assay

Onoue, Satomi, Seto, Yoshiki, Oishi, Ami, Yamada, Shizuo·2009·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Drug-induced phototoxic skin responses involves photoirritation, photoallergy, and photogenotoxicity. In the present study, we attempted to develop effective analytical tools to predict the photogenotoxic potential of pharmaceutical substances on the basis of their photobiological and DNA-binding properties. Photocleavage of plasmid DNA was assessed by capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE), and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from photoirradiated photosensitizers was also assessed by spectrophotometrical determination. The affinity of drugs with DNA was determined by fluorescent titration or competitive binding assay using ethidium bromide. Structural transition from supercoiled form to open circular form of plasmid DNA were observed in the presence of nine irradiated-photosensitizers, however DNA damage by six phototoxic and five nonphototoxic drugs were negligible or weak even though some chemicals exhibited significant generation of ROS. DNA photocleavers tended to interact with DNA, binding constants of which were found to be less than 1 microM, whereas most nonphotogenotoxic chemicals failed to bind with DNA. The differences in DNA-binding properties might be attributed to a data discrepancy between ROS-generation and DNA photocleaving activity. The combination use of ROS assay and DNA-binding assay could be fast and reliable prediction for the photogenotoxic potential of a large number of drug candidates at the drug-discovery stage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jps.21670

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ROS data might not always provide a reliable indication for the capacity of a chemical to participate in a photogenotoxic cascade.

    “according to Onoue et al. [79], ROS data might not always provide a reliable indication for the capacity of a chemical to participant in a photogenotoxic cascade.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onoue, S., Seto, Y., Oishi, A., & Yamada, S.
Affiliations
Shizuoka University (JP)
Corresponding author
Onoue, Satomi
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
3647-3658
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079072451
Cited by
14
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
photogenotoxicity, reactive oxygen species, DNA binding affinity, photosensitizers, ethidium bromide binding, supercoiled DNA, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Circular Dichroism, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA, Superhelical, Ethidium, Light, Mutagens, Plasmids, Predictive Value of Tests, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Photosensitizing Agents, Reactive Oxygen Species, Dermatitis, Phototoxic, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review