Cited by 70Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Effects of in-package atmospheric cold plasma treatment on the qualitative, metabolic and microbial stability of fresh-cut pears

Zhang, Yingtong, Zhang, Jianhao, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Hu, Huali, Luo, Shufen, Zhang, Leigang, Zhou, Hongsheng, Li, Pengxia·2021·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The greatest hurdle to commercial marketing of fresh‐cut fruits and vegetables is limited shelf life due to microbial hazards and quality deterioration. Atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) is an emerging non‐thermal technology with significant potential to improve the safety and storability of fresh products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of ACP, generated in sealed packaging, on the qualitative, metabolic and microbial stability of fresh‐cut pears during simulated cold storage. RESULTS: ACP treatments were effective in inhibiting the growth of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeast and mold, particularly CP3 (65 kV, 1 min), which could prolong shelf life to the greatest extent. While decontamination was not always associated with an increase in plasma intensity. Moreover, at 65 kV for 1 min, ACP treatment had the potential to retard respiration, and maintain organoleptic properties and other quality attributes. Additionally, peroxidase and pectin methylesterase (PME) activities were reduced immediately after treatments. These effects were dependent on treatment voltage and time, while a subsequent recovery in activity was only observed for PME. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from this study will contribute to an understanding of the effects of in‐package ACP treatments on the storability and microbial safety of fresh‐cut pears. This knowledge could be beneficial in reducing quality losses for fresh‐cut pears and the preservation of other products. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.11085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Hu, H., Luo, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, H., & Li, P.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Hongsheng
  • Li, Pengxia
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
101
Issue
11
Pages
4473-4480
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W3119084709
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901746)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190265)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
cold atmospheric plasma, fresh-cut pears, shelf life extension, microbial decontamination, mesophilic aerobic bacteria, molds and yeasts, respiration rate, sensory quality, peroxidase activity, pectin methylesterase, cold storage, non-thermal food preservation
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases, Food Preservation, Fruit, Fungi, Peroxidase, Plant Proteins, Quality Control, Food Packaging, Pyrus, Plasma Gases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review