Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors affecting the levels of catechins and caffeine in tea beverage: estimated daily intakes and antioxidant activity

Shishikura, Yoko, Khokhar, Santosh·2005·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Increased public awareness of health benefits of green tea is generally based on the high polyphenol content of tea leaves and the resulting beverage. A number of factors, such as species, season, agronomic condition and age of the leaves, are known to affect the composition of commercial teas. In the present study the effects of factors associated with domestic preparation and analytical methods, such as brewing time, concentration, solvent and type of tea product, on levels of catechins and caffeine, antioxidant activity and estimated daily intakes were investigated. There were large variations in the levels of total catechins: 43 and 117 mg g−1 dry matter (DM) (brewed for 30 s and 5 min respectively); 72 and 161 mg g−1 DM (extracted in boiling water and 50% acetonitrile respectively); 72 and 117 mg g−1 DM (a tea bag and tea leaves respectively). The effects on caffeine content were comparatively smaller. These variations consequently led to considerable variations in estimated daily intakes based on three cups (600 ml), ranging between 538 and 2014 mg g−1 DM of total catechins and between 103 and 466 mg g−1 DM of caffeine. The antioxidant activity was highest (26 680 µmol g−1 DM) for tea leaves brewed for 5 min and lowest (10 110 µmol g−1 DM) for a tea bag product brewed for 1 min. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2206

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01018-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90059-Q · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blot WJ, 1996, Tea and cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence, Eur J Cancer Prevent, 5, 425
  4. 10.1271/bbb1961.52.1879 · doi:10.1271/bbb1961.52.1879
  5. 10.1161/01.HYP.6.3.437 · DOI
  6. Imai K, 1985, Cross sectional study of effects of drinking tea on cardiovascular and liver disease, Biochem Med J, 310, 693
  7. 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90060-U · DOI
  8. 10.1006/pmed.2002.1130 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92876-U · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/biof.5520130109 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/pmed.1997.0242 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s002130050709 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00005344-199005000-00001 · DOI
  14. Bara AI, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  15. 10.1039/b102541b · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1021/jf980223x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1039/a909219f · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0304-3835(97)04653-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1006/abio.1996.0292 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1021/jf9913458 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/jf010153l · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1021/jf020342j · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1079/BJN2001483 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.3136/nskkk.42.419 · doi:10.3136/nskkk.42.419
  26. 10.1021/jf021066b · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/jsfa.1597 · doi:10.1002/jsfa.1597
  28. 10.1021/jf9908042 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Shishikura, Y., & Khokhar, S.
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-05
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
2125-2133
ISSN
  • 0022-5142
  • 1097-0010
Cited by
32
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.