The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L)
Abstract
Influence of S and N application on seed yield and quality of a double low (low erucic acid and glucosinolate content) variety of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L) was examined in field experiments at both S‐sufficient and S‐deficient sites. At the S‐sufficient site, application of S had no significant influences on seed yield, yield components, seed protein and oil contents, and resulted in only a marginal increase in seed glucosinolate content. Application of N increased seed yield and protein content, but decreased oil content concurrently. A significant increase in seed glucosinolate content in response to the increasing N rate was obtained at this site, which was more noticeable in those treatments with applied S than without. In contrast, at the S‐deficient site, there were significant interactions between S and N on seed yield, protein and glucosinolate contents. Increasing the N rate beyond 150 kg ha−1 did not increase seed yield in the absence of applied S. However, with an application of 300 kg N ha−1, seed yield increased by 10·7% with an application of 50 kg S ha−1. The effect of N on seed yield was achieved mainly through enhanced pod formation, and that of S through reduced pod abortion. Sulphur application also increased seed protein content at the high N rate, and increased methionine content at the expense of aspartic acid. On average, a two‐fold increase in seed glucosinolate content in response to an application of 100 kg S ha−1 was obtained at the S‐deficient site. Also, increasing the N rate decreased seed glucosinolate content in the absence of applied S, but increased it when S was applied. The interaction between S and N on seed glucosinolate content was explained in terms of the allocation of S towards primary and secondary metabolites within plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., & Crosland, A. R. (1994) · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · doi:10.1080/00103629409369047 · Cited by 317
Self-citationMeldau, D. G., Meldau, S., Hoang, L. H., Underberg, S., Wunsche, H., & Baldwin, I. T. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.114744 · Cited by 284
Riar, A., Gill, G., & McDonald, G. K. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10101505 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, F., Evans, E. J., Bilsborrow, P. E., & Syers, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-37
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2088253251
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2740630106
- The paper
- Zhao, F., Evans, E. J., Bilsborrow, P. E., & Syers, J. K. (1993). Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740630106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.