Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of three wet digestion methods for the determination of plant sulphur by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP‐AES)

Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., Crosland, A. R.·1994·Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Abstract

Increased incidence of sulphur (S) deficiency in crops has led to a greater need for S determination in plant tissues. Among the methods available for measurement of S, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP‐AES) has been proved to be accurate and rapid. This paper compares digestion with HNO3‐HClO4, fuming HNO3‐KNO3 and alkaline NaOBr prior to the S measurement by ICP‐AES. Both HNO3‐HClO4 and fuming HNO3‐KNO3 were found to give satisfactory results for five certified plant materials, with high accuracy and precision. The HNO3‐HClO4 method involved a rigid temperature control, with slow ramp rates and a final temperature (190°C) lower than the boiling point of HClO4, to minimise the possibility of gaseous losses of S. Both methods can also be used for the simultaneous determination of phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and manganese (Mn), and additionally potassium (K) with HNO3‐HClO4. In contrast, the alkaline NaOBr method was less suitable as a digestion procedure for S measurement by ICP‐AES, because it involved a large dilution factor and produced high blank values.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00103629409369047

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., & Crosland, A. R.
Venue
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Published
1994-02
Volume
25
Issue
3-4
Pages
407-418
ISSN
  • 0010-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2416
OpenAlex
W2069050769
Cited by
317
References
6
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of three wet digestion methods for the determination of plant sulphur by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP‐AES). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00103629409369047
The paper
Zhao, F., McGrath, S. P., & Crosland, A. R. (1994). Comparison of three wet digestion methods for the determination of plant sulphur by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP‐AES). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.