Stability of fatty acids during wilting of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): effect of bruising and environmental conditions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidation of fatty acids (FA) during field wilting of herbage could cause extensive losses of polyunsaturated FA. Recent studies showed a variable effect of wilting on the losses of FA. This suggests that environment and management conditions influence the loss of FA during wilting. The present study investigated the stability of FA in untreated and mechanically bruised perennial ryegrass, wilted under field conditions for 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h, or wilted under controlled climate conditions at three temperatures (15, 25 or 35 °C) and two light (dark or light) regimes to dry matter (DM) contents of 425, 525 or 625 g kg−1. RESULTS: During 48 h of field wilting, the total FA content declined (15.2 to 11.9 g kg−1 DM) consistently, despite an increase in herbage DM content (197 to 676 g kg−1). Under controlled climate conditions, the herbage total FA content declined (15.1 to 11.7 g kg−1 DM) mainly during the prolonged (56 to 62 h) initial drying to a DM content of 425 g kg−1 and did not decline with further drying to DM contents of 525 and 625 g kg−1. The decline in total FA was associated with a parallel decline in C18:3 content under field (9.15 to 6.36 g kg−1 DM) and controlled (9.12 to 6.15 g kg−1 DM) conditions. Concomitantly, the proportion of C18:3 in total FA decreased, whilst the proportion of C16:0 and C18:0 increased. Lower losses of FA (P < 0.05) were observed at 15 °C compared to 25 and 35 °C. Light did not affect the losses of FA during wilting. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the wilting period mainly affected the changes in FA content and composition. Stability of FA in herbage could be increased by minimising the duration of wilting. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variation in maturity at ensiling affects silage DMI, milk yield and milk composition of dairy cows.
“affecting silage DMI, milk yield and milk composition of dairy cows.16 -21”
From Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality (2015) · cites this paper as [21]
The indexed passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic details and keywords about cutting date and silage, but no finding about dairy cows. Searches for maturity, dry-matter intake, milk yield, and milk composition found no passage addressing the claimed effects. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wright, Gordon, Steen, & Patterson (2000) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00198.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality
Khan, N. A., Yu, P., Ali, M., Cone, J. W., & Hendriks, W. H. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6703 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationCauses of variation in fatty acid content and composition in grass and maize silages
Khan, N. A., Cone, J. W., Fievez, V., & Hendriks, W. H. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.02.006 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Khan, N. A., Cone, J. W., Fievez, V., & Hendriks, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Nazir A
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-28
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1659-1665
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2169539002
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Keywords
- fatty acid stability, fatty acid oxidation, perennial ryegrass, wilting, bruising, polyunsaturated fatty acids, linolenic acid, temperature effects, light conditions, dry matter content, forage quality
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Climate, Darkness, Environment, Fatty Acids, Light, Lolium, Stress, Physiological, Temperature, Lipid Peroxidation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review