The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate peel extracts as affected by cultivar
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some studies have reported that different parts of the pomegranate fruit, especially the peel, may act as potential antimicrobial agents and thus might be proposed as a safe natural alternative to synthetic antimicrobial agents. The high tannin content, especially punicalagin, found in pomegranate extracts, has been reported as the main compound responsible for such antimicrobial activity. Because the pomegranate peel chemical composition may vary with the type of cultivar (sweet, sour–sweet and sour), pomegranates may also differ with respect to their antimicrobial capacity. RESULTS: The extract from PTO8 pomegranate cultivar peel had the highest antimicrobial activity, as well as the highest punicalagins (α and β) and ellagic acid concentrations. In the results obtained from both antibacterial and antifungal activity studies, the sour–sweet pomegranate cultivar PTO8 showed the best antimicrobial activity, and the highest ellagic acid concentrations. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that ellagic acid content has a significant influence on the antimicrobial activity of the pomegranate extracts investigated. The pomegranate peel of the PTO8 cultivar is a good source of antifungal and antibacterial compounds, and may represent an alternative to antimicrobial agents of synthetic origin. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-06 · Cited by 4,174
Cristani, M., D'Arrigo, M., Mandalari, G., Castelli, F., Sarpietro, M. G., Micieli, D., Venuti, V., Bisignano, G., Saija, A., & Trombetta, D. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf070094x · Cited by 671
Stress, drugs, and evolution: the role of cellular signaling in fungal drug resistance.
Cowen, L. E., & Steinbach, W. J. (2008) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00041-08 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
Bouarab Chibane, L., Degraeve, P., Ferhout, H., Bouajila, J., & Oulahal, N. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9357 · Cited by 469
Efenberger-Szmechtyk, M., Nowak, A., & Czyzowska, A. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1722060 · Cited by 435
Singh, J., Kaur, H. P., Verma, A., Chahal, A. S., Jajoria, K., Rasane, P., Kaur, S., Kaur, J., Gunjal, M., Ercisli, S., et al. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02586 · Cited by 152
Smaoui, S., Hlima, H. B., Mtibaa, A. C., Fourati, M., Sellem, I., Elhadef, K., Ennouri, K., & Mellouli, L. (2019) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107914 · Cited by 147
Evaluation of pomegranate peel in ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis
Demiray, E., Karatay, S. E., & Dönmez, G. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.200 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosas‐Burgos, E. C., Burgos‐Hernández, A., Noguera‐Artiaga, L., Kačániová, M., Hernández‐García, F., Cárdenas‐López, J. L., & Carbonell‐Barrachina, Á. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-09
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 802-810
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2358418986
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
