The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent developments in nanotechnology transforming the agricultural sector: a transition replete with opportunities
Abstract
The applications and benefits of nanotechnology in the agricultural sector have attracted considerable attention, particularly in the invention of unique nanopesticides and nanofertilisers. The contemporary developments in nanotechnology are acknowledged and the most significant opportunities awaiting the agriculture sector from the recent scientific and technical literature are addressed. This review discusses the significance of recent trends in nanomaterial‐based sensors available for the sustainable management of agricultural soil, as well as the role of nanotechnology in detection and protection against plant pathogens, and for food quality and safety. Novel nanosensors have been reported for primary applications in improving crop practices, food quality, and packaging methods, thus will change the agricultural sector for potentially better and healthier food products. Nanotechnology is well‐known to play a significant role in the effective management of phytopathogens, nutrient utilisation, controlled release of pesticides, and fertilisers. Research and scientific gaps to be overcome and fundamental questions have been addressed to fuel active development and application of nanotechnology. Together, nanoscience, nanoengineering, and nanotechnology offer a plethora of opportunities, proving a viable alternative in the agriculture and food processing sector, by providing a novel and advanced solutions. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats.
Ventola, C. L. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 4,516
Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards
Aktar, W., Sengupta, D., & Chowdhury, A. (2009) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7 · Cited by 3,584
A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance
Pickering, K. L., Efendy, M. G. A., & Le, T. M. (2016) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 · Cited by 3,479
Designing materials for biology and medicine
Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02388 · Cited by 3,198
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053
The use of nanocrystals in biological detection
Alivisatos, P. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt927 · Cited by 3,008
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680
Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead
Pingali, P. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912953109 · Cited by 2,442
Cited by
Raji, Z., Karim, A., Karam, A., & Khalloufi, S. (2023) · Waste · doi:10.3390/waste1030046 · Cited by 517
Green Synthesis of Nanofertilizers and Their Application as a Foliar for Cucurbita pepo L
Shebl, A., Hassan, A. A., Salama, D. M., Abd El-Aziz, M. E., & Abd Elwahed, M. S. A. (2019) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2019/3476347 · Cited by 130
Fortunati, E., Mazzaglia, A., & Balestra, G. M. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9341 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-27
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 849-864
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2766743260
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 179
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
