Cited by 37

Recent update on methodologies for extraction and analysis of soybean seed proteins

Luthria, Devanand L, Maria John, Kollakondan M, Marupaka, Ramesh, Natarajan, Savithiry·2018·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Soybean is one of the best sources of plant protein. Development of improved soybean cultivars through classical breeding and new biotech approaches is important to meet the growing global demand for soybeans. There is a critical need to investigate changes in protein content and profiles to ensure the safety and nutritional quality of new soybean varieties and their food products. A proteomics study begins with an optimal combination of extraction, separation and detection approaches. This review attempts to provide a summary of current updates in the methodologies used for extraction, separation and detection of protein from soybean, the basic foundations for good proteomic research. This information can be effectively used to investigate modifications in protein content and profiles in new varieties of soybeans and other crops. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.9235

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Luthria, D. L., Maria John, K. M., Marupaka, R., & Natarajan, S.
Affiliations
  • Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center USDA‐ARS Beltsville MD USA
  • Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory USDA‐ARS Beltsville MD USA
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
98
Issue
15
Pages
5572-5580
ISSN
  • 0022-5142
  • 1097-0010
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Agricultural Research Service (1245‐21220‐232‐00D)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review