Cited by 60Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsFood and Agricultural SciencesFood Industry and Aquatic Biology

Assessment of food quality and microbial safety of brown macroalgae (Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima)

Open access
Blikra, Marthe J, Løvdal, Trond, Vaka, Mette R, Roiha, Irja S, Lunestad, Bjørn Tore, Lindseth, Cecilie, Skipnes, Dagbjørn·2019·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid increase in the number of seaweed farms in the Western world, and it is crucial for these companies and their customers to have standardized methods for quality assessment and optimization. The aim of this study was to adapt known methods for food-quality determination for the analysis of seaweed quality, including color, texture, and microbiology, and to discuss optimal heat treatments for the popular macroalgae Saccharina latissima and Alaria esculenta. RESULTS: The development of an attractive, green color during heating was highly specific to species, freezing history, and part of the thallus. Resilience and thermostability were also species dependent. Low microbial numbers (1-3 log cfu/g) for total aerobic count, psychrotrophic bacteria, and spore-forming bacteria were found, but Bacillus spp. were isolated. No enterococci, coliforms, pathogenic vibrios, or Listeria monocytogenes were detected. CONCLUSION: The methods employed were able to describe clearly the physical and microbial qualities of A. esculenta and S. latissima, and quality changes during processing. Based on the results, optimal cooking for a minimum of 15 min at 95 °C was suggested for S. latissima. Fresh and frozen A. esculenta showed the greenest color after heating for 5-9 s at a high temperature (> 85 °C). If a higher heat load is needed to achieve safe and stable food products, using fresh and not frozen A. esculenta is highly recommended, as fresh specimens remain green even after 15 min at 95 °C. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.9289

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 60

Authors
Blikra, M. J., Løvdal, T., Vaka, M. R., Roiha, I. S., Lunestad, B. T., Lindseth, C., & Skipnes, D.
Affiliations
  • Nofima (NO)
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
Corresponding author
Blikra, Marthe J
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-19
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
1198-1206
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2884613487
Cited by
60
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Research Council of Norway, Regional Department West (245474)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Keywords
brown macroalgae, Alaria esculenta, Saccharina latissima, food safety, microbial contamination, heat treatment (food and biological processing), cooking time, color change, thermal stability, Bacillus, psychrotrophic bacteria, spore-forming bacteria
MeSH terms
Phaeophyceae, Bacteria, Cooking, Food Contamination, Food Preservation, Seaweed, Vegetables, Food Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review