Ensiling characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation, microbial communities and aerobic stability of low‐dry matter silages produced with sweet sorghum and alfalfa mixtures
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Silages produced with grass and legume mixtures may have positive associative effects on silage quality and animal performance when ruminants are fed the silages. The present study aimed to determine the preservation characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation profile and microbial abundance of silages, produced with mixtures of sweet sorghum (SS) and alfalfa (AF) in different ratios: 100:0 (Control), 75:25 (SA25), 50:50 (SA50), 25:75 (SA75) and 0:100 (SA100) on a fresh weight basis. RESULTS: As the proportion of AF increased in the silages, pH, acetic acid, ammonia nitrogen and crude protein (CP) concentrations, and aerobic stability increased (P < 0.05), whereas lactic acid and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) concentrations decreased (P < 0.05). Increasing the proportion of AF in the silages, increased (P < 0.05) the in vitro degradability of dry matter and CP, as well as the proportions of genus Prevotella, but decreased (P < 0.05) the in vitro degradability of NDF (IVNDFD) and ADF (IVADFD) and proportions of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Compared to the Control silage, SA25 silage had greater (P < 0.05) proportions of Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, IVNDFD, IVADFD, ruminal short chain fatty acids and microbial protein concentrations, as well as lower (P < 0.05) methane production. CONCLUSION: The silage produced with the SS to AF ratio of 75:25 was the most suitable for ruminants use as a result of the optimal balance of fermentation quality, feed-nutritional value and aerobic stability. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feeding alfalfa silage increased the relative abundance of F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens while reducing CH4 production in the cow rumen as compared to sweet sorghum silage.
“Feeding of alfalfa silage increased the relative abundance of F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens while reducing CH4 production in the cow rumen as compared to sweet sorghum silage.”
From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [115]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J., & Shao, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Shao, Tao
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2140-2151
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2896448681
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672488)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Keywords
- silage, sweet sorghum, alfalfa, grass-legume mixtures, in vitro rumen fermentation, rumen microbiota, aerobic stability, silage fermentation quality, in vitro degradation, methane production, ruminant feed, short-chain fatty acids, microbial protein
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aerobiosis, Medicago sativa, Animals, Animal Feed, Bacteria, Cattle, Dietary Fiber, Digestion, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Fermentation, Nutritive Value, Rumen, Silage, Sorghum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review