Cited by 71Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics SystemsPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesGrowth and nutrition in plants

Macronutrient deprivation eustress elicits differential secondary metabolites in red and green-pigmented butterhead lettuce grown in a closed soilless system

El‐Nakhel, Christophe, Pannico, Antonio, Kyriacou, Marios C, Giordano, Maria, De Pascale, Stefania, Rouphael, Youssef·2019·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Through precise control of the nutrient solution (NS), closed soilless systems enable targeted manipulation of plant secondary metabolites, which constitute health‐promoting components of the human daily diet. A nutrient film technique (NFT) system was employed to assess the effect of NS macronutrient‐based concentration (full, half‐, and quarter‐strength corresponding to electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.5, 0.75, and 0.5 dS m−1) on the bioactive profile of red and green‐pigmented Salanova® butterhead lettuce. RESULTS: Half‐strength NS reduced fresh biomass of both cultivars by 14%, whereas quarter‐strength NS reduced the fresh biomass of green and red Salanova by 24% and 38%, respectively. However, moderate nutrient stress (half‐strength NS) boosted red Salanova total ascorbic acid, chlorogenic, chicoric, caffeoyl‐meso‐tartaric, total phenolic acids, and anthocyanins concentrations by 266%, 199%, 124%, 251%, 162%, and 380%, respectively compared with the control, full‐strength NS. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional eustress and appropriate cultivar selection are effective means to increase phytochemical content and optimize year‐round production of lettuce in closed soilless systems. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.9985

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El‐Nakhel, C., Pannico, A., Kyriacou, M. C., Giordano, M., De Pascale, S., & Rouphael, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Agruicultural Research Institute (CY)
  • Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Naples Federico II Portici Italy
Corresponding author
Rouphael, Youssef
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
99
Issue
15
Pages
6962-6972
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2968086399
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
Keywords
eustress, butterhead lettuce, nutrient film technique, secondary metabolites, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, vitamin C, chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, cultivar differences, nutrient solution strength, biomass reduction, phytochemicals
MeSH terms
Nutrients, Anthocyanins, Ascorbic Acid, Phenols, Plant Leaves, Hydroponics, Lactuca, Phytochemicals, Secondary Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review