The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior single institution studies suggest MRI may improve the assessment of the extent of cancer within the breast, and thus reduce the risk of leaving macroscopic disease in the breast following breast conservation therapy. We report on the rate of MRI and mammography detection of foci of distinct incidental cancer in a prospective, multi center trial involving 426 women with confirmed breast cancer at 15 institutions in the US, Canada, and Germany. METHODS: Women underwent mammography and MRI prior to biopsy of the suspicious index lesion. Additional incidental lesions (IL) greater than 2 cm from the index lesion that were detected by mammography and MRI were noted and characterized. Biopsy recommendations were associated with ILs given an assessment of suspicious or highly suspicous (BiRads 4 and 5). These assessments were considered a positive test. RESULTS: MRI had a significantly higher yield of confirmed cancer ILs than mammography (0.18 (95%CI: 0.142-0.214) for MRI versus 0.072 (95%CI: 0.050-0.100) for mammography). The cancer ILs detected by MRI alone appeared to be similar to those detected by mammography with respect to size and histology. The percentage of biopsies of ILs that resulted in a cancer diagnosis was similar between the modalities (MRI 0.72(95%CI: 0.6-0.81); Mammography 0.85 (95%CI: 0.62-0.96)). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that consideration needs to be given regarding the integration of breast MRI into the pretreatment evaluation of women seeking breast conservation therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R. G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E. R., Jeong, J.-H., & Wolmark, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022152 · Cited by 6,249
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Mariani, L., Greco, M., Saccozzi, R., Luini, A., Aguilar, M., & Marubini, E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020989 · Cited by 4,450
van Dongen, J. A. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143 · Cited by 1,271
Jacobson, J. A., Danforth, D. N., Cowan, K. H., d'Angelo, T., Steinberg, S. M., Pierce, L., Lippman, M. E., Lichter, A. S., Glatstein, E., & Okunieff, P. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199504063321402 · Cited by 892 · cited 1×
“The local recurrence rates for breast conservation therapy (BCT) vary from 3% to 19% at 10 years [16–23].”
BackgroundArriagada, R., Lê, M. G., Rochard, F., & Contesso, G. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.5.1558 · Cited by 612 · cited 1×
“The local recurrence rates for breast conservation therapy (BCT) vary from 3% to 19% at 10 years [16–23].”
Background
Cited by
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Sardanelli, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Decker, T., Federico, M., Gilbert, F. J., Helbich, T., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Kaiser, W. A., Kerin, M. J., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015 · Cited by 992
Self-citationKatipamula, R., Degnim, A. C., Hoskin, T., Boughey, J. C., Loprinzi, C., Grant, C. S., Brandt, K. R., Pruthi, S., Chute, C. G., Olson, J. E., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.19.4225 · Cited by 373
Solin, L. J., Orel, S. G., Hwang, W.-T., Harris, E. E., & Schnall, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.5448 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnall, M. D., Blume, J., Bluemke, D. A., DeAngelis, G. A., DeBruhl, N., Harms, S., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Hylton, N., Kuhl, C. K., Pisano, E. D., Causer, P., Schnitt, S. J., Smazal, S. F., Stelling, C. B., Lehman, C., Weatherall, P. T., & Gatsonis, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-38
- ISSN
- 0022-4790 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9098
- OpenAlex
- W2042715737
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jso.20381
- The paper
- Schnall, M. D., Blume, J., Bluemke, D. A., DeAngelis, G. A., DeBruhl, N., Harms, S., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Hylton, N., Kuhl, C. K., Pisano, E. D., Causer, P., Schnitt, S. J., Smazal, S. F., Stelling, C. B., Lehman, C., Weatherall, P. T., & Gatsonis, C. A. (2005). MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. Journal of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.