The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10‐year experience at Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC)
Abstract
Background: The incidence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) in the US is 1.2/100,000. This report examines the patterns of presentation, adjuvant treatment and survival of a large cohort of patients with GBC evaluated at MSKCC over a 10‐year period. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients referred to MSKCC with a diagnosis of GBC between January 1995 and December 2005 was performed. Patients were identified from the MSKCC cancer registry. Information extracted included, demographics, clinical and pathological stage, surgical management, pathology, adjuvant and palliative therapy, date of relapse, death or last follow‐up. Date of diagnosis was defined as date of surgery or biopsy. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. Results: Four hundred thirty‐five GBC cases were identified: 285 (65.5%) females,150 (34.5%) males. Median age 67 years (range 28–100). Pathology: 88% adenocarcinoma, 4% squamous, 3% neuroendocrine, 2% sarcoma. 36.6% presented as AJCC Stage IV. 47% were discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One hundred thirty‐six of these were re‐explored, of whom 100 (73.5%) had residual disease. Of those who underwent curative resections (N = 123), 8 (6.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 8 (6.5%) chemoradiation alone and 8 (6.5%) both chemoradiation and systemic chemotherapy. Median overall survival for the cohort was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.8–11.8) with a median follow up of 26.6 months. The median survival for those presenting with stage Ia–III disease was 12.9 months (95% CI 11.7–15.8 months) and 5.8 months (95% CI 4.5–6.7) for those presenting with stage IV disease. Median survival was 15.7 months (95% CI 12.4–18.4) for those discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For those who underwent re‐exploration, median survival was 14.6 months (95% CI 12.6–18.3) if residual disease was present, and 72 months (95% CI 34 to infinity) if no evidence of disease. The median survival for those who received adjuvant therapy was 23.4 months (95% CI 15.7–47). Conclusions: GBC is commonly diagnosed incidentally (47%). Re‐exploration reveals a high incidence of residual disease (74%). Median survival is better for patients who have no evidence of disease on re‐exploration (72 months) compared to those with residual disease detected (P < 0.0001). Overall prognosis is poor. Although we did not observe a survival benefit for those who received adjuvant therapy, the study did not have sufficient power to address this question. In addition, the number of patients who received adjuvant therapy was small with marked heterogeneity in clinical and therapeutic details, precluding any definitive conclusions being drawn. Prospective randomized trials of adjuvant therapy are needed in this disease. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008;98:485–489. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer
Lazcano-Ponce, E. C., Miquel, J. F., Munoz, N., Herrero, R., Ferrecio, C., Wistuba, I. I., Alonso de Ruiz, P., Aristi Urista, G., & Nervi, F. (2001) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.51.6.349 · Cited by 866
Study Group of Surgical Adjuvant Therapy for Carcinomas of the Pancreas and Biliary Tract, Takada, T., Amano, H., Yasuda, H., Nimura, Y., Matsushiro, T., Kato, H., Nagakawa, T., & Nakayama, T. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.10831 · Cited by 631
Jarnagin, W. R., Ruo, L., Little, S. A., Klimstra, D., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Wagman, R., Blumgart, L. H., & Fong, Y. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11699 · Cited by 454
Self-citationPapakostas, P., Kouroussis, C., Androulakis, N., et al. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00214-3 · Cited by 52
Biliary tract cancers: current concepts and controversies
Leonard, G. D., & O'Reilly, E. M. (2005) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.6.2.211 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Cited by
Roa, J. C., García, P., Kapoor, V. K., Maithel, S. K., Javle, M., & Koshiol, J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00398-y · Cited by 401
SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery
Overby, D. W., Apelgren, K. N., Richardson, W., & Fanelli, R. (2010) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7 · Cited by 313
The association between BMI and gallbladder cancer risk: A meta-analysis
Li, Z.-M., Wu, Z.-X., Han, B., Mao, Y.-Q., Chen, H.-L., Han, S.-F., Xia, J.-L., & Wang, L.-S. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9664 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffy, A., Capanu, M., Abou‐Alfa, G. K., Huitzil, D., Jarnagin, W., Fong, Y., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Blumgart, L. H., & O'Reilly, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-18
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 485-489
- ISSN
- 0022-4790 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9098
- OpenAlex
- W2143574380
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10‐year experience at Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jso.21141
- The paper
- Duffy, A., Capanu, M., Abou‐Alfa, G. K., Huitzil, D., Jarnagin, W., Fong, Y., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Blumgart, L. H., & O'Reilly, E. M. (2008). Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10‐year experience at Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). Journal of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.