The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography
Abstract
Separation of polar compounds on polar stationary phases with partly aqueous eluents is by no means a new separation mode in LC. The first HPLC applications were published more than 30 years ago, and were for a long time mostly confined to carbohydrate analysis. In the early 1990s new phases started to emerge, and the practice was given a name, hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). Although the use of this separation mode has been relatively limited, we have seen a sudden increase in popularity over the last few years, promoted by the need to analyze polar compounds in increasingly complex mixtures. Another reason for the increase in popularity is the widespread use of MS coupled to LC. The partly aqueous eluents high in ACN with a limited need of adding salt is almost ideal for ESI. The applications now encompass most categories of polar compounds, charged as well as uncharged, although HILIC is particularly well suited for solutes lacking charge where coulombic interactions cannot be used to mediate retention. The review attempts to summarize the ongoing discussion on the separation mechanism and gives an overview of the stationary phases used and the applications addressed with this separation mode in LC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SHOU, W., & NAIDONG, W. (2005) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.01.011 · Cited by 136
Cited by
High-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Retention and selectivity of stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction chromatography
Guo, Y., & Gaiki, S. (2011) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.06.052 · Cited by 310
Gevi, F., Zolla, L., Gabriele, S., & Persico, A. M. (2016) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-016-0109-5 · Cited by 251
HPLC methods for simultaneous determination of ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acids
Nováková, L., Solich, P., & Solichová, D. (2008) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.08.006 · Cited by 210
Glycomic analysis by capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry
Mechref, Y., & Novotny, M. V. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20196 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemström, P., & Irgum, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1784-1821
- ISSN
- 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9314
- OpenAlex
- W2145600171
- Cited by
- 1,176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jssc.200600199
- The paper
- Hemström, P., & Irgum, K. (2006). Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200600199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.