Rapid determination of parabens in personal care products by stable isotope GC‐MS/MS with dynamic selected reaction monitoring
Abstract
In this study, a rapid and sensitive analytical method for the determination of methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and butyl esters of para-hydroxy benzoic acid (parabens) in personal care products was developed and fully validated. Test portions were extracted with methanol followed by vortexing, sonication, centrifugation, and filtration without derivatization. The four parabens were quantified by GC-MS/MS in the electron ionization mode. Four corresponding isotopically labeled parabens were selected as internal standards, which were added at the beginning of the sample preparation and used to correct for recovery and matrix effects. Sensitivity, extraction efficiency, and recovery of the respective analytes were evaluated. The coefficients of determination (r(2)) were all greater than 0.995 for the four parabens investigated. The recoveries ranged from 97 to 107% at three spiked levels and a one-time (single) extraction efficiency greater than 97% was obtained. This method has been applied to screen 26 personal care products. This is the first time that a unique GC-MS/MS method with dynamic selected reaction monitoring and confirmation of analytes has been used to determine these parabens in cosmetic personal care products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The measured values were in good agreement with those previously reported in the literature for similar samples.
“The measured values were in good agreement with those previously reported in the literature for similar samples [53,54].”
From Automated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of the organic phase (2018) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours
Darbre, P. D., Aljarrah, A., Miller, W. R., Coldham, N. G., Sauer, M. J., & Pope, G. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.958 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Personal care products and endocrine disruption: A critical review of the literature
Witorsch, R. J., & Thomas, J. A. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2010.515563 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of the safety of application of cosmetic products containing parabens
Matwiejczuk, N., Galicka, A., & Brzóska, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.3917 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Ocaña-González, J. A., Villar-Navarro, M., Ramos-Payán, M., Fernández-Torres, R., & Bello-López, M. A. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.07.002 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Automated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of the organic phase
Medina, D. A. V., Santos-Neto, Á. J., Cerdà, V., & Maya, F. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.081 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, P. G., & Zhou, W.
- Affiliations
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Perry G.
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-26
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1781-1787
- ISSN
- 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9314
- OpenAlex
- W1926290881
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Separation Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- parabens, personal care products, cosmetics, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, isotope-labeled internal standards, matrix effects, preservatives
- MeSH terms
- Cosmetics, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Parabens, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review