Cited by 54Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of in situ derivatization techniques for enhanced bioanalysis using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry

Baghdady, Yehia Z., Schug, Kevin A.·2016·Journal of Separation Science

Abstract

Accurate and specific analysis of target molecules in complex biological matrices remains a significant challenge, especially when ultra‐trace detection limits are required. Liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry is often the method of choice for bioanalysis. Conventional sample preparation and clean‐up methods prior to the analysis of biological fluids such as liquid–liquid extraction, solid‐phase extraction, or protein precipitation are time‐consuming, tedious, and can negatively affect target recovery and detection sensitivity. An alternative or complementary strategy is the use of an off‐line or on‐line in situ derivatization technique. In situ derivatization can be incorporated to directly derivatize target analytes in their native biological matrices, without any prior sample clean‐up methods, to substitute or even enhance the extraction and preconcentration efficiency of these traditional sample preparation methods. Designed appropriately, it can reduce the number of sample preparation steps necessary prior to analysis. Moreover, in situ derivatization can be used to enhance the performance of the developed liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry‐based bioanalysis methods regarding stability, chromatographic separation, selectivity, and ionization efficiency. This review presents an overview of the commonly used in situ derivatization techniques coupled to liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry‐based bioanalysis to guide and to stimulate future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jssc.201501003

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Curry Z., 1982, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 5, 257
  2. Al‐Dirbashi O., 2007, Drug Discoveries Ther, 1, 108
  3. Wong P. L. L., 2012, Poster presented at the 60th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics
  4. Gundry R. L., 2009, Curr. Protocols Mol. Biol., 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Baghdady, Y. Z., & Schug, K. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Corresponding author
Schug, Kevin A.
Venue
Journal of Separation Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
102-114
ISSN
  • 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9314
OpenAlex
W2195492704
Cited by
54
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Separation Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
in situ derivatization, bioanalysis, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, sample preparation, biological matrices, on-line derivatization, preconcentration, ionization efficiency, ultra-trace detection, biological fluids
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review