Thermo‐Assisted Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on Dispersive Liquid‐Liquid Microextraction for Preconcentration of Phthalate Esters in Water Samples and Determination by Gas Chromatography With Flame Ionization Detection
Open accessAbstract
A thermo‐assisted deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection was developed for the analysis of five phthalate esters in different water samples. In the procedure involved, a DES composed of lidocaine, an amphiphilic amine, and oleic acid, was mixed with the sample assisted by ultrasound, and phase separation was achieved with increasing temperature. The heating of the extraction system induced the change of acid‐base properties of the DES components. Thus, the formation of microdroplets of DES in the sample was provided, and two phases were separated. The structure of the upper hydrophobic layer was characterized by Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy. Also, the amount of water in the DES phase was analyzed by mass spectrometer and Karl Fischer titration. Some critical variables on the extraction yield were assessed. The proposed method achieved 1.2–1.3 and 4.1–4.3 µg/L for limits of detection and limits of quantification, respectively. The intra‐day and inter‐day percentage relative standard deviations (n = 5) were determined to be in the range of 4.2–6.2% and 5.1–7.2%, respectively. Ultimately, this method analyzed the five phthalate esters in different water samples with high recoveries.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A thermo-assisted deep eutectic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method was developed to preconcentrate five phthalate esters from water before GC-FID analysis. Using a lidocaine/oleic acid DES with ultrasound, salt, and heating, the method achieved low µg/L detection limits and high recoveries in tap, bottled, and seawater samples.
Key findings
- LODs were 1.2–1.3 µg/L and LOQs were 4.1–4.3 µg/L; calibration was linear from 4.5 to 1000 µg/L with R² values above 0.9950.
- Enrichment factors ranged from 117.7 to 119.5, extraction recoveries from 94.2% to 95.6%, intra-day RSDs from 4.2% to 6.2%, and inter-day RSDs from 5.1% to 7.2% (n = 5).
- In spiked real water samples, recoveries were 92.6%–101.2%, matrix effects were 93.3%–99.8%, and same-day RSDs were 2.7%–6.5% (n = 3).
- The optimized conditions were a 1:1 oleic acid/lidocaine DES, 100 µL DES, 12% NaCl, 1 min ultrasound at 20°C, 3 min heating at 40°C, and pH 7 without pH adjustment; the analytical eco-scale score was 83.
Methods
- The DES was prepared by mixing oleic acid as hydrogen bond donor and lidocaine as hydrogen bond acceptor in a 1:1 molar ratio. Extraction used 10 mL water sample containing 100 µg/L PAEs, 100 µL DES, ultrasound for 1 min, 12% NaCl, and a 40°C water bath for 3 min; the floated phase was injected into GC-FID.
- Five PAEs were studied: dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, di-iso-butyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Samples included tap water from Tehran, bottled Damavand mineral water, and seawater from Chabahar Beach and Velasht Lake.
- Characterization used FT-IR, GC-MS, and Karl Fischer titration; validation covered LOD, LOQ, linearity, enrichment factor, extraction recovery, and RSD, with real-sample spiking at 10 and 100 µg/L and greenness assessed by analytical eco-scale and green analytical procedure index.
Limitations
- The paper does not state explicit limitations.
- Evident from the text: only five phthalate esters and water matrices were tested, so applicability to more complex matrices such as food or biological samples is not shown.
- Evident from the comparison table: the method’s LODs (1.2–1.3 µg/L) are higher than several cited alternative methods (e.g., 0.026–0.5 µg/L), although the proposed method is presented as greener and faster.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 15 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
For all spiked sample groups, the recovery of PAEs ranged from 92.6% to 101.2%.
“As shown in Table 3, the recovery of PAEs and ME% in all groups of the spiked samples were in the range of 92.6%-101.2% and 93.3%-99.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A DES volume of 100 μL was chosen as optimal.
“Hence, to obtain higher extraction recoveries, 100 µL of the extraction solvent was opted as the optimal volume.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Extraction recoveries decreased in strongly acidic or alkaline solutions.
“On the contrary, the extraction recoveries were diminished in strong acidic or alkaline solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The proposed method gave limits of detection of 1.2-1.3 μg/L and limits of quantification of 4.1-4.3 μg/L for the five phthalate esters.
“The proposed method achieved 1.2-1.3 and 4.1-4.3µg/L for limits of detection and limits of quantification, respectively.”
- Also stated in: § 3.7 Validation of the Method · plain
“LODs and LOQs were in the range of 1.2-1.3 and 4.1-4.3µg/L, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.7 Validation of the Method · plain
- Findingown data
An ultrasonic time of 1 min was optimal.
“Based on the observed results, the ultrasonic time of 1 min was selected as an optimal time to attain the best output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The extraction recoveries of the presented method were better than those of the other methods.
“According to the results, the ER values for the presented method are better than the other methods”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The method used 12% NaCl as the phase separation agent.
“Therefore, the method was performed with 12% NaCl as a phase separation agent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The O-H stretching band of oleic acid near 3390 cm−1 shifted to about 3270 cm−1 in the DES.
“As shown in Figure 2, the band at approximately 3390 cm -1 was attributed to the stretching vibration of the OH of OA.In contrast, the OH stretching vibration in the DES was detected at around 3270 cm -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The organic DES phase contained 5.8% by weight water.
“Using mass spectrometry, less than 0.5% wt DES was detected in the aqueous phase, while the amount of water was 5.8% wt in the organic phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extraction recovery of the phthalate esters increased as the DES volume rose up to 100 μL.
“The extraction recoveries of the PAEs improved with the increase of the extraction solvent volume up to 100 µL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The calibration correlation coefficients were above 0.9950.
“The correlation coefficients (R 2 ) higher than 0.9950 confirmed the linearity of the method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Increasing temperature caused the extraction solvent droplets to agglomerate.
“Furthermore, the change in the temperature led to the agglomeration of extraction solvent droplets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Collecting the extract phase at volumes below 50 μL was difficult.
“The collecting of the extract phase in lower volumes than 50 µL was difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mass spectrometry detected less than 0.5% by weight of DES in the aqueous phase.
“Using mass spectrometry, less than 0.5% wt DES was detected in the aqueous phase, while the amount of water was 5.8% wt in the organic phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the tested oleic acid:lidocaine molar ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1, and 3:1), the 1:1 ratio gave the best extraction result.
“The outcomes indicated (Figure 3) that the best result was obtained at a 1:1 molar ratio.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The eutectic point of a DES is related to the molar ratio of its components.
- Findingnone given
The DES-water combination used in the method underwent phase separation at 40 °C.
“In this method, a combination of DES and water was employed and showed a phase separation at an elevated temperature (40 • C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The analytical eco-scale score for the method was 83.
“The results indicated that the score was 83 and according to AES, the method can be considered as a green analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The matrix effect (ME%) for the spiked samples ranged from 93.3% to 99.8%.
“As shown in Table 3, the recovery of PAEs and ME% in all groups of the spiked samples were in the range of 92.6%-101.2% and 93.3%-99.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The linear range for the five PAEs was 4.5-1000 μg/L.
“| DMP | 1.3 | 4.2 | 4.5-1000 | 117.7 | 0.9967 | 94.2 | 7.2 | 4.4 | | DEP | 1.2 | 4.1 | 4.5-1000 | 119.5 | 0.9959 | 95.6 | 5.1 | 6.2 | | DIBP | 1.3 | 4.2 | 4.5-1000 | 119.1 | 0.9964 | 95.3 | 6.3 | 4.9 | | DBP | 1.3 | 4.2 | 4.5-1000 | 118.6 | 0.9993 | 94.9 | 5.8 | 4.5 | | DEHP | 1.3 | 4.3 | 4.5-1000 | 118.1 | 0.9978 | 94.5 | 6.9 | 4.2 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When samples were analyzed three times on the same day, the relative standard deviations ranged from 2.7% to 6.5%.
“Also, the samples were analyzed three times on the same day with RSDs between 2.7% and 6.5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proposed method had limits of detection of 1.2-1.3 μg/L.
“The proposed method indicated low LODs (1.2-1.3 µg/L) and a wide linear range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The shift of the O-H stretching band to a lower wavenumber indicates that hydrogen bonds formed in the DES.
“This shift to a lower wavenumber region of the O-H indicates the formation of the hydrogen bond in the DES.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The oleic acid-lidocaine DES formed an acid-base reaction through hydrogen bonds between the amine group of lidocaine and the carboxylic acid group of oleic acid.
“The DES containing OA and LD formed an acid-base reaction through H-bonds between the amine group of LD and the carboxylic acid group of OA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The formation of hydrogen bonds between components is an important factor in forming a DES.
- Premisecitation
Coulombic, hydrogen-bond, or π-π interactions between analytes and DESs enable effective extraction.
“Interactions, such as Coulombic, H-bond, or π-π, between analytes and DESs provide an effective extraction [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] 15. O. Longeras, A. Gautier, K. B-Busserolles, and J.-M. Andanson, "Deep Eutectic Solvent With Thermo-switchable Hydrophobicity," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 8 (2020): 12516-12520, https://doi. org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03478. source
- Premisecitation
pH can alter the hydrolysis and solubility of analytes in the aqueous phase.
“The pH level can change the hydrolysis and the solubility of analytes in the aqueous phase [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] 16. M. Ezoddin, K. Abdi, S. Behnamipour, and M. H. S. Javadi, "Air- assisted in Situ Deep Eutectic Solvent Decomposition Followed by the Solidification of Floating Organic Droplets-liquid-liquid Microextrac- tion Method for Extraction of Azole Antifungal Drugs in Biological Samples Prior to High-performance Liquid Chromatography," Journal of Separation Science 45 (2022): 1757-1765, https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc. 202100965. source
- Premisecitation
Adding enough salt can break the homogeneous phase of extraction solvent and sample, causing the analyte to be extracted into tiny extraction-solvent droplets.
“On the other hand, the addition of a sufficient amount of salt can break the homogenous phase of the extraction solvent and sample, and the analyte is extracted into tiny droplets of extraction solvent [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] 23. V. Alimoradi, A. Mogaddam, M. R. Afshar Mogaddam, M. A. Farajzadeh, M. Nemati, and F. Lotfipour, "Surfactant-assisted Salting- out Homogenous Liquid-liquid Extraction Based on Deep Eutectic Solvents Using Central Composite Design; Application in the Extraction of Natamycin From Fruit Juices Before Its Determination by HPLC- UV," Microchemical Journal 179 (2022): 107504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. microc.2022.107504. source
- Interpretationreasoning
The method had a short extraction time because of ultrasonication and the increased surface area between fine extraction-solvent droplets and the aqueous sample.
“The used method had a short time for the extraction due to the use of ultrasonication and the increase of the large surface area between the fine droplets of the extraction solvent and the aqueous sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Ultrasound increased the dispersion of the extraction solvent and its surface area, which facilitated transfer of analytes from the aqueous sample into the extraction solvent.
“Ultrasonic increased the dispersion of the extraction solvent in the sample solution and provided a more area surface.As a result, the migration of analytes from the aqueous sample to the extraction solvent was facilitated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DLLME method needs a dispersant or auxiliary device to disperse the extraction solvent in the sample solution and enhance the rate and time of the extraction.
- Interpretationreasoning
As temperature increases, the acid-base reaction becomes less favorable.
“Therefore, with increasing temperature, the acid-base reaction becomes less favorable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lidocaine has a highly temperature-sensitive pKa value of 8.
- Interpretationown data
The method showed no significant matrix effect.
“Therefore, no significant matrix effect was observed in this method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
According to the analytical eco-scale, the method qualifies as a green analysis.
“The results indicated that the score was 83 and according to AES, the method can be considered as a green analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] 30. A. Gałuszka, Z. M. Migaszewski, P. Konieczka, and J. Namieśnik, "Analytical Eco-Scale for Assessing the Greenness of Analytical Proce- dures," Trends in Analytical Chemistry 37 (2012): 61-72, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013. source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
- May combine two claims. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmphiphilic amines like lidocaine have been suggested as hydrogen bond acceptors, while medium- or long-chain carboxylic acids act as hydrogen bond donors for temperature-responsive DES formation.
“Amphiphilic amines such as lidocaine (LD), have been proposed as HBAs, while mediumor long-chain carboxylic acids serve as HBDs for the TRDES formation [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] 20. J. Castaneda Corzo, K. Ballerat-Busserolles, J. Y. Coxam, A. Gautier, and J. M. Andanson, "Thermo-switchable Hydrophobic Solvents For- mulated With Weak Acid and Base for Greener Separation Processes," Journal of Molecular Liquids 377 (2023): 121468, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.molliq.2023.121468. source
The Introduction (p. 4) describes lidocaine as an amphiphilic amine combined with hydrophobic carboxylic acids, and Section 3.1.1 (pp. 8–9) reports temperature-dependent phase separation in aqueous DES made from lidocaine and linear aliphatic acids. The paper treats these as weak-base/weak-acid systems, but our copy does not describe lidocaine and the acids specifically as hydrogen-bond acceptors and donors. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUltrasonic extraction works through acoustic cavitation in the sample solution.
“As a new supplemental extraction method, ultrasonic extraction utilizes the cavitation effect by forming acoustic cavitation in the sample solution [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] 21. E. Roselló-Soto, M. Koubaa, A. Moubarik, et al., "Emerging Opportu- nities for the Effective Valorization of Wastes and by-products Generated During Olive Oil Production Process: Non-Conventional Methods for the Recovery of High-added Value Compounds," Trends in Food Science and Technology 45 (2015): 296-310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.003. source
No full text of Roselló-Soto et al. (2015) is available here, and two searches scoped to that paper returned no snippets. An unscoped result about olive-oil extraction cites Roselló-Soto et al. when discussing ultrasound-assisted extraction, so the citation is plausible, but it does not establish that their paper explains acoustic cavitation. The suggested Jyoti source describes a general cavitation effect; it does not show that the claim was misattributed. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDLLME offers high efficiency, simple operation, and low consumption of extraction and dispersion solvents.
“DLLME has advantages such as high efficiency, simple operation, and low consumption of extraction and dispersion solvents [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 12. E. Pourbasheer, F. Qasemi, M. Rouhi, Z. Azari, and M. R. Ganjali, "Preconcentration and Determination of 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole by Dispersive Liquid-liquid Microextraction and Experimental Design," Journal of Separation Science 40 (2017): 2467-2473, https://doi.org/10. 1002/jssc.201601453. source
The cited paper’s title establishes that it uses DLLME, but two paper-scoped searches returned no passages about the stated advantages, so the attribution cannot be verified from its text. A different review, “Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices,” describes DLLME as efficient, simple, and low in solvent consumption (score 0.725). Those are general properties of the method, not evidence that the claim was taken from that review rather than the cited paper; misattribution is not established. (LLM, conf=0.66)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtraction recovery of the phthalate esters increased as sample pH rose from 2 to 6, then stayed constant from pH 7 to 8.
“The results in Figure 7 indicated that the extraction recovery of PAEs increased when the sample pH increased from 2 to 6 and then the extraction recoveries remained constant with the pH increase from pH 7 to 8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtraction recovery increased as NaCl concentration rose from 0% to 12% w/v, but from 12% to 20% w/v there was no significant difference.
“The results illustrated that with rising NaCl concentration from 0% to 12%, the extraction recovery increased, and then, from 12% to 20% w/v, there was no significant difference in the extraction recoveries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 20°C the system was a single liquid phase, while increasing temperature produced droplets of extraction solvent.
“The results presented a single liquid phase at 20 • C, while with increasing temperature droplets of the extraction solvent appeared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe method's enrichment factors were 117.7-119.5, and its extraction recoveries were 94.2-95.6%.
“EFs and ERs were obtained in the range of 117.7-119.5 and 94.2%-95.6%,respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 100 μg/L, intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations with n = 5 were 4.2-6.2% and 5.1-7.2%, respectively.
“The intra-day and inter-day percentage relative standard deviations (n = 5) were determined to be in the range of 4.2-6.2%and 5.1-7.2%,respectively.”
- Also stated in: § 3.7 Validation of the Method · plain
“Furthermore, RSDs% at a concentration of 100 µg/L of each analyte were obtained in the range of 4.2%-6.2%and 5.1%-7.2%for intra-day (n = 5) and inter-day (n = 5) precision, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.7 Validation of the Method · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCalibration curves for the five phthalate esters were linear from 4.5 to 1000 μg/L.
“The calibration curves were plotted using a series of solutions with different concentrations of five PAEs in the range of 4.5-1000 µg/L being extracted with the developed method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA DES made from oleic acid as hydrogen bond donor and lidocaine as hydrogen bond acceptor was selected and gave the highest extraction recovery.
“In this research, a DES composed of OA as the HBD and LD as the HBA was selected and demonstrated the highest extraction recovery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown datapH 7 was selected as optimal.
“According to the results, pH 7 was selected in this work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDESs are highly biodegradable, biocompatible, switchable, easy to synthesize, and low in toxicity, and they extract organic and inorganic compounds well.
“DESs have become one of the best replacements for toxic organic solvents because they demonstrate some specific characteristics such as high biodegradability, biocompatibility, switch ability, easy synthesis, and low toxicity as well as the excellent ability for extraction of organic and inorganic compounds [15][16][17][18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15][16][17][18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTemperature change shifts the pKa, which alters the system's ionic strength and the water solubility of the DES.
“Temperature change provides the change of pKa, which will affect the system's ionic strength and then change DES's solubility in water [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. J. Zhang, S. Li, L. Yao, L. Yi Yuexing Shen, Z. Li, and H. Qiu, "Responsive Switchable Deep Eutectic Solvents. A Review," Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023): 107750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022. 107750. source
- Rests on an assumption: Lidocaine has a highly temperature-sensitive pKa value of 8.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA DES is made by combining two or more non-toxic hydrogen bond donors and acceptors in a specific molar ratio, producing a eutectic mixture via hydrogen bonding.
“DESs are obtained by mixing two or more non-toxic hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) and hydrogen bond acceptors (HBAs) at a specific molar ratio, which can result in a eutectic mixture through hydrogen bond interactions [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] 15. O. Longeras, A. Gautier, K. B-Busserolles, and J.-M. Andanson, "Deep Eutectic Solvent With Thermo-switchable Hydrophobicity," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 8 (2020): 12516-12520, https://doi. org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03478. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe developed method enhanced DES dispersion without a dispersive solvent, whereas other methods required dispersive solvents.
“Dispersion of DES was enhanced by the developed method without any dispersive solvent while other methods required dispersive solvents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUsing TADES-DLLME without additional components allowed effective extraction of phthalate esters while avoiding toxic solvents.
“The use of TADES-DLLME without using additional components allowed the effective extraction of PAEs, avoiding the usage of toxic solvents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Traditional DLLME uses hazardous organic solvents.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTemperature control and bath heating time are needed because oleate becomes hydrophobic oleic acid in the DES as temperature rises.
“Furthermore, temperature control and bath heating time are necessary because the oleate changes to hydrophobic OA in the DES with increasing temperature [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] 24. Q. Liu, Z. Li, L. Wei, X. Chen, Y. Xu, and J. Zhao, "Fast Dispersive Liquid-liquid Microextraction of Pesticides in Water Based on a Thermo Switchable Deep Eutectic Solvent," Environmental Chemistry Letters 20 (2022): 2271-2276, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01431-y. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUltrasonic time helps disperse the extraction solvent into the aqueous sample and increases mass transfer of target compounds into the extraction solvent.
“It helps to spread the extraction solvent into the aqueous sample and increase the mass transfer of the target compounds to the extraction solvent [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] 21. E. Roselló-Soto, M. Koubaa, A. Moubarik, et al., "Emerging Opportu- nities for the Effective Valorization of Wastes and by-products Generated During Olive Oil Production Process: Non-Conventional Methods for the Recovery of High-added Value Compounds," Trends in Food Science and Technology 45 (2015): 296-310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.003. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn temperature-responsive DES methods, heating or cooling the aqueous phase alters the DES acid-base properties and causes in situ microdroplet formation.
“In TRDES-based procedures, the heating or cooling of the aqueous phase induced the change of their acidbase properties of DES, and thus it attributed to the in situ formation of microdroplets of TRDES.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. J. Zhang, S. Li, L. Yao, L. Yi Yuexing Shen, Z. Li, and H. Qiu, "Responsive Switchable Deep Eutectic Solvents. A Review," Chinese Chemical Letters 34 (2023): 107750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022. 107750. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe salting-out effect lowers the diffusion coefficient in the aqueous solution and raises extraction recovery of the analytes.
“Theoretically, the salting out effect reduces the diffusion coefficient in the aqueous solution and increases the extraction recovery of the analytes [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. I. C. Stratigou, A. Tsiasioti, P. D. Tzanavaras, C. K. Markopoulou, K. Fytianos, and C. K. Zacharis, "Homogeneous Liquid Liquid Extraction Using Salt as Mass Separating Agent for the Ultra High Pressure Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Doxorubicin in Human Urine," Microchemical Journal 158 (2020): 105260, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.microc.2020.105260. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe method is effective and simple for analyzing PAEs in various matrices.
“In conclusion, the results confirmed that this method can be effective and easy for analyzing PAEs in different matrices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ultrasonic treatment improves the dispersion of the extraction solvent and increases the surface area in a short time.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAn analytical eco-scale score above 75 represents an excellent green analysis.
“The scores of more than 75 represent an excellent green analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] 30. A. Gałuszka, Z. M. Migaszewski, P. Konieczka, and J. Namieśnik, "Analytical Eco-Scale for Assessing the Greenness of Analytical Proce- dures," Trends in Analytical Chemistry 37 (2012): 61-72, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013. source
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional DLLME uses hazardous organic solvents.
“Unfortunately, the traditional DLLME method uses hazardous organic solvents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lidocaine has a highly temperature-sensitive pKa value of 8.
“LD has a highly temperature-sensitive pKa value (pKa = 8).”
The paper relies on this without support.
At ambient conditions, an acid-base reaction between lidocaine and carboxylic acid occurs in the aqueous phase.
“At ambient conditions, an acid-base reaction between LD and carboxylic acid occurs in the aqueous phase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The formation of hydrogen bonds between components is an important factor in forming a DES.
“The formation of hydrogen bonds between the components is an important factor in forming a DES.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The eutectic point of a DES is related to the molar ratio of its components.
“Also, the eutectic point of a DES is related to the molar ratio of its components.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The DLLME method needs a dispersant or auxiliary device to disperse the extraction solvent in the sample solution and enhance the rate and time of the extraction.
“The DLLME method needs a dispersant or auxiliary device to disperse the extraction solvent in the sample solution and enhance the rate and time of the extraction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ultrasonic treatment improves the dispersion of the extraction solvent and increases the surface area in a short time.
“Ultrasonic was applied to elevate the dispersion of the extraction solvent in the sample solution and increase the surface area in a very short time (1 min).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Heating-time and temperature figure references are reversed
MinorThe text assigns temperature to Figure 5 and heating time to Figure 6, but Figure 5's caption identifies it as the heating-time experiment.
“Therefore, the temperature range of 30-60 • C (Figure 5) and heating time of 1-6 min (Figure 6) were studied.”
“FIGURE 5Effect of water bath heating time on the extraction recovery of phthalate esters.”
Cites
Abbott, A. P., Capper, G., Davies, D. L., Rasheed, R. K., & Tambyrajah, V. (2003) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b210714g · Cited by 5,738 · see citing works
Abbott, A. P., Boothby, D., Capper, G., Davies, D. L., & Rasheed, R. K. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja048266j · Cited by 4,340 · see citing works
Analytical Eco-Scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures
Gałuszka, A., Migaszewski, Z. M., Konieczka, P., & Namieśnik, J. (2012) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013 · Cited by 2,474 · see citing works
A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index
Płotka-Wasylka, J. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013 · Cited by 2,328 · see citing works
Human health impacts of exposure to phthalate plasticizers: An overview of reviews
Eales, J. F., Bethel, A. C., Galloway, T. S., Hopkinson, P., Morrissey, K., Short, R., & Garside, R. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106903 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Roselló-Soto, E., Koubaa, M., Moubarik, A., Lopes, R. P., Saraiva, J. A., Boussetta, N., Grimi, N., & Barba, F. J. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.003 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Phthalate exposure and childrens neurodevelopment: A systematic review
Ejaredar, M., Nyanza, E. C., Ten Eycke, K., & Dewey, D. (2015) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.014 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Radke, E. G., Braun, J. M., Nachman, R. M., & Cooper, G. S. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105408 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Chen, X., & Jiang, X. (2011) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.01.024 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Responsive switchable deep eutectic solvents: A review
Zhang, J., Li, S., Yao, L., Yi, Y., Shen, L., Li, Z., & Qiu, H. (2023) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107750 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Deep Eutectic Solvent with Thermo-Switchable Hydrophobicity
Longeras, O., Gautier, A., Ballerat-Busserolles, K., & Andanson, J.-M. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03478 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Ramos‐Payán, M., Bello‐López, M. Á., Fernández‐Torres, R., Villar-Navarro, M., & Mochón, M. C. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.12.006 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Sajid, M., Basheer, C., Alsharaa, A., Narasimhan, K., Buhmeida, A. S., Al-Qahtani, M. H., & Al-Ahwal, M. S. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.016 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Kiani, A., Ahmadloo, M., Shariatifar, N., et al. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1471-y · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Farajzadeh, M. A., Djozan, D., Reza, M., Mogaddam, M. R. A., & Norouzi, J. (2012) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201100853 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Ranjbari, E., & Hadjmohammadi, M. R. (2012) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.08.019 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
González‐Sálamo, J., González‐Curbelo, M. Á., Socas‐Rodríguez, B., et al. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.180 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
ZHANG, Z.-M., Zhang, H., Li, J., & Yang, G. (2017) · Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s1872-2040(17)60999-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Nazraz, M., Yamini, Y., Ramezani, A. M., & Dinmohammadpour, Z. (2020) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461756 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Razavi, N., & Yazdi, A. S. (2017) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201601059 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Stratigou, I.-C., Tsiasioti, A., Tzanavaras, P. D., Markopoulou, C. K., Fytianos, K., & Zacharis, C. K. (2020) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2020.105260 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Li, Z., Wei, L., Chen, X., Xu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01431-y · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Jafari, Z., Ghani, M., & Raoof, J. B. (2023) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2023.109269 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Heydari, N., Ghorbani‐Kalhor, E., Asgharinezhad, A. A., et al. (2023) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2023.108704 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cheng, H., Song, Y., Wang, F., et al. (2018) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2018.03.019 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Cao, L., & Li, Y. (2024) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.202300776 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Castaneda Corzo, J., Ballerat-Busserolles, K., Coxam, J.-Y., Gautier, A., & Andanson, J.-M. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121468 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Pezhhanfar, S., Farajzadeh, M. A., Mirzaahmadi, A., et al. (2023) · Chemical Papers · doi:10.1007/s11696-023-02766-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Alimoradi, V., Afshar Mogaddam, M. R., Farajzadeh, M. A., Nemati, M., & Lotfipour, F. (2022) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2022.107504 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Khoshmaram, L., Abdolmohammad‐Zadeh, H., & Ghaffarzadeh, E. (2018) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201800555 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ezoddin, M., Abdi, K., Behnamipour, S., & Javadi, M. H. S. (2022) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.202100965 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationPourbasheer, E., Qasemi, F., Rouhi, M., Azari, Z., & Ganjali, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201601453 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/1615‐9314(20020101)25:1/23.0.CO;2‐3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martins, R. O., Will, C., Magalhães, M. F. A., & Lanças, F. M. (2025) · Journal of Chromatography Open · doi:10.1016/j.jcoa.2025.100240 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Morelli, D. C., Morés, L., & Carasek, E. (2024) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.70060 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Fattahi, N., Hashemi, B., Zohrabi, P., Karimi, P., & Shiri, F. (2025) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.147208 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Farajzadeh, M. A., Asghari, Z. H., Pezhhanfar, S., & Mogaddadam, M. R. A. (2025) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.70146 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Conde-Díaz, A., Santana‐Mayor, Á., Socas-Rodríguez, B., Herrera‐Herrera, A. V., & Rodríguez‐Delgado, M. Á. (2026) · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.scp.2026.102423
- Authors
- Abdi, K., Ezoddin, M., Novasari, V., & Lamei, N.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Payame Noor University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Ezoddin, Maryam
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- e202300878-e202300878
- ISSN
- 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9314
- OpenAlex
- W4402711704
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Separation Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Payame Noor University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- phthalates, deep eutectic solvents, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, water samples, lidocaine, oleic acid, ultrasound-assisted extraction, preconcentration, microdroplets, acid-base properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review