Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist with older primary care patients
Abstract
In this article the authors evaluated the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist's (PCL) psychometric properties in 142 older adult primary care patients screened for several psychiatric disorders. Several established PCL scoring rules were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed a PCL score of 37 achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity, when compared to the PCL's algorithm-derived PTSD diagnosis (based on whether at least one reexperiencing, three avoidance/numbing, and two hyperarousal symptoms were endorsed with a rating of 3 or higher, indicating at least moderate severity). Among depressed, anxious, and substance abusing older adults, the PCL demonstrated adequate internal consistency. It also revealed similar convergence with the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale, found in previous research. Implications for using the PTSD Checklist with community-dwelling older adults in primary care are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among older primary care adults, the PCL-C shows good internal consistency and convergent validity.
“The PCL-C has good internal consistency and convergent validity among older adults in primary care (Cook, Elhai & Aréan, 2005).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for late-life anxiety: Similarities and differences between Veteran and community participants (2015) · cites this paper as Cook, Elhai & Aréan, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Cook, J. M., Elhai, J. D., & Areán, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
- University of South Dakota (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Joan M.
- Venue
- Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-376
- ISSN
- 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6598
- OpenAlex
- W1991925286
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD Checklist, psychometric properties, older adults, primary care, screening, diagnostic thresholds, sensitivity and specificity, depression, anxiety, substance abuse, internal consistency, re-experiencing symptoms, hyperarousal symptoms, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Panic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review