Cited by 28Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disordersMigration, Health and Trauma

Testing a DSM‐5 reformulation of posttraumatic stress disorder: Impact on prevalence and comorbidity among treatment‐seeking civilian trauma survivors

van Emmerik, Arnold A. P., Kamphuis, Jan H.·2011·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

The authors investigated a recent reformulation (Brewin, Lanius, Novac, Schnyder, & Galea, 2009) of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in treatment‐seeking civilian trauma survivors. Diagnostic data from a randomized controlled trial (N = 170) were subjected to the criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) and the Brewin criteria for PTSD. Results revealed no change in PTSD prevalence, though substantial but equal (13%) proportions of participants lost or gained a PTSD diagnosis under the Brewin criteria. Rates of comorbid depression and other anxiety disorders were consistently marginally lower under the Brewin criteria, but these differences did not reach significance in the authors' sample. It was concluded that the 8‐item Brewin criteria for PTSD altered the diagnostic status of a substantial number of participants without influencing overall PTSD prevalence or comorbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.20630

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MPSS-SR provided the reduced PTSD symptom set as they are specified for ICD-11.

    “The MPSS-SR provided the reduced PTSD symptom set as they are specified for ICD-11 (see Van Emmerik & Kamphuis, 2011).”

    From Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: a latent profile analysis (2013) · cites this paper as Van Emmerik & Kamphuis, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Emmerik, A. A. P., & Kamphuis, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
213-217
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2123345990
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, DSM-5, PTSD diagnostic criteria, PTSD prevalence, PTSD comorbidity, depression, anxiety disorders, treatment-seeking patients, diagnostic reclassification
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Survivors, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review