Cited by 102Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentElder Abuse and Neglect

Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: Results From a National Epidemiologic Survey

Okuda, Mayumi, Olfson, Mark, Wang, Shuai, Rubio, Jose M., Xu, Yang, Blanco, Carlos·2015·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

This study presents data on the association of intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and rates of psychiatric disorders, and other correlates. Data were drawn from Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States, 18 years and older, residing in households and group quarters. The sample comprised adults who reported being in a relationship within the past 12 months ( N = 25,631). Of these, 1,677 individuals reported perpetrating IPV (4.2% in men, 7.0% in women). Compared to non‐IPV perpetrators, IPV perpetrators had greater odds of having any psychiatric disorder, 42.0% and 67.7%, respectively, OR = 2.89, 95% CI [2.51, 3.32]. After adjusting for the effects of nuisance variables, being younger, having an alcohol use disorder, a personality disorder, low levels of social support, and low income were associated with perpetration. Across a wide range of factors, IPV victimization itself had the strongest association with perpetration, AOR = 66.12, 95% CI [55.01, 79.48]. Mental health assessments of IPV perpetrators might offer an opportunity to identify and treat psychiatric disorders and improve the clinical course of conditions that can be affected by ongoing acts of violence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21986

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okuda, M., Olfson, M., Wang, S., Rubio, J. M., Xu, Y., & Blanco, C.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital North Shore, Long Island Jewish Health System Glen Oaks New York USA
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
Corresponding author
Okuda, Mayumi
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-26
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
49-56
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1573142473
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA019606, DA023200)
  • National Institutes of Health (MH082773, MH076051)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA133050)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18 HS021112)
  • Chapman Perelman Foundation
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, violence perpetration, mental illness, alcoholism, personality disorders, social support, low income, IPV victimization, risk factors, mental health screening
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Income, Male, Personality Disorders, Sex Factors, Social Support, United States, Crime Victims, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review