CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,024Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMigration, Health and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale

Blake, Dudley David, Weathers, Frank W., Nagy, Linda M., Kaloupek, Danny G., Gusman, Fred D., Charney, Dennis S., Keane, Terence M.·1995·Journal of Traumatic Stress
DOI 10.1002/jts.2490080106
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Several interviews are available for assessing PTSD. These interviews vary in merit when compared on stringent psychometric and utility standards. Of all the interviews, the Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS‐1) appears to satisfy these standards most uniformly. The CAPS‐1 is a structured interview for assessing core and associated symptoms of PTSD. It assesses the frequency and intensity of each symptom using standard prompt questions and explicit, behaviorally‐anchored rating scales. The CAPS‐1 yields both continuous and dichotomous scores for current and lifetime PTSD symptoms. Intended for use by experienced clinicians, it also can be administered by appropriately trained paraprofessionals. Data from a large scale psychometric study of the CAPS‐1 have provided impressive evidence of its reliability and validity as a PTSD interview.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.2490080106

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Blake D. D. Weathers F. Nagy L. Kaloupek D. G. Klauminzer G. Charney D. &Keane T. M. (1992 October).The development of a structured interview for Post‐traumatic Stress Disorder. In D. D. Blake (Chair) An update on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scales (CAPS‐1 and CAPS‐2). Symposium presented at the meeting of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies Los Angeles.
  2. DiNardo P. A., 1988, Anxiety Disorders Interview Scale — Revised
  3. Kulka R. A., 1988, Contractual report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study Volume 1: Executive summary, description of findings, and technical appendices
  4. Robins L. N., 1981, The NIMH diagnostic interview schedule. Version III
  5. Spielberger C. D., 1970, Manual for the State‐Trait Anxiety Interview (self‐evaluation questionnaire)
  6. Spitzer R. L., 1985, Structural Clinical Interview for DSM‐III‐R — patient edition (SCID‐P)
  7. Spitzer R. L., 1990, Structural Clinical Interview for DSM‐III‐R — Patient edition (With Psychotic Screen)‐SCID‐P
  8. Weathers F. W. Blake D. D. Krinsley K. Haddad W. Huska J. &Keane T. M. (October 1992b).The Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale — Diagnostic Version (CAPS‐1): Description use and psychometric properties. In D. D. Blake (Chairperson) An update on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scales (CAPS‐1 and CAPS‐2). Symposium presented at the meeting of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies Los Angeles.
  9. Weathers F. W. Blake D. D. &Litz B. T. (August 1991).Reliability and validity of a new structured interview for PTSD. In T. M. Keane (Chairperson) Advances in psychometric assessment of combat‐related post‐traumatic stress disorder. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association San Francisco CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–514 of 514

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., & Keane, T. M.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Blake, Dudley David
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
75-90
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
DOI
10.1002/jts.2490080106
OpenAlex
W2093982682
Cited by
5,024
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 263 · 2019: 272 · 2018: 254 · 2017: 310 · 2016: 356 · 2015: 353 · 2014: 368 · 2013: 319 · 2012: 264
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 4071 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, PTSD assessment, structured interviews, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, symptom rating scales
MeSH terms
Humans, Interview, Psychological, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review