AIUM–ACR–ACOG–SMFM–SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scanning guidelines comprise a checklist of standard planes, structures and anatomies to be surveyed, but do not dictate the order in which the checklist should be populated.
“Such scanning guidelines comprise typically a checklist of standard planes, structures and anatomies to be surveyed, but do not dictate the order in which the checklist should be populated.”
From Clinical workflow of sonographers performing fetal anomaly ultrasound scans: Deep-learning-based analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 216
- Venue
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- E13-E24
- ISSN
- 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9613
- OpenAlex
- W4211007304
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 20.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- prenatal ultrasound, quality assurance, prenatal diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Societies, Medical, United States, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
