First-Trimester Abdominal Circumference (Versus Crown Rump Length) Improves Precision in Inter- and Intraobserver Variability
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate inter‐ and intraobserver variability of first‐trimester biometric measurements and crown‐rump length (CRL) and to compare the accuracy and precision of CRL with these biometric measurements used in the interpretation of first‐trimester nuchal translucency (NT). Methods: Women presenting for a first trimester ultrasound were recruited. Both a sonographer, and a maternal fetal medicine specialist individually examined each participant. Each examiner obtained three independent measurements of CRL, a standardized set of biometric measurements (biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, humerus length, and femur length), and an NT between 11 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks of gestation. Biometry‐specific expected NT values were calculated using linear and quadratic regression models and were used to convert results into multiples of the median. Results: Fetal biometric measurements, CRL, and NT measurements were obtained in 356 consecutive pregnancies with singleton fetuses. CRL demonstrated the least intra‐ and interobserver variability as demonstrated by the smallest coefficient of variance. However, abdominal circumference and head circumference were not statistically different from CRL variance. CRL and abdominal circumference showed the smallest standard deviation when calculating multiples of the median for NT interpretation. Conclusion: First‐trimester abdominal circumference demonstrates the most intra‐ and interobserver precision for dating and calculating NT multiples of the median, which could potentially be useful with obesity and in any setting with technical limitations of sonography.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measurement of the abdominal circumference demonstrates high intra- and inter-observer precision.
“Of note, studies have shown that measurement of the AC demonstrates high intra- and inter-observer precision and should be considered an integral component of first-trimester fetal evaluation [29,30].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Abdominal circumference should be considered an integral component of first-trimester fetal evaluation.
“Of note, studies have shown that measurement of the AC demonstrates high intra- and inter-observer precision and should be considered an integral component of first-trimester fetal evaluation [29,30].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Robinson, H. P. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5883.28 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Afshar, Y., Gutkin, R., Krakow, D., Cuckle, H., Silverman, N. S., & Platt, L. D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Los Angeles California
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Afshar, Yalda
- Venue
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-28
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2161-2167
- ISSN
- 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9613
- OpenAlex
- W2908027876
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- first-trimester ultrasound, abdominal circumference, crown-rump length, nuchal translucency, fetal biometry, interobserver variability, intraobserver variability, measurement precision, gestational dating, head circumference, humerus length, femur length, biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, maternal obesity
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Waist Circumference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review