Cited by 392Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy

Open access
Robinson, H. P.·1973·BMJ

Abstract

A method is reported by which the "in utero" crown-rump length of the fetus may be determined by sonar in the first trimester of pregnancy. The accuracy of the technique was assessed by comparing the sonar and the direct postabortum measurements of fetuses in cases of missed abortion. A normal curve of fetal crown-rump length was derived from 214 examinations on 80 patients and by using these values in a further "blind" series it was found possible to predict the maturity of pregnancy to within three days, between the sixth and the 14th weeks of pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.4.5883.28

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AWMF, ISUOG and SOGC consider crown-rump length to be the most accurate method for determining gestational age in spontaneously conceived pregnancies.

    “More specifically, the AIUM and ASUM base their antenatal care on the date of the last menstrual period (LMP), while the AWMF, ISUOG and SOGC consider the crown–rump length (CRL) to be the most accurate method for determining gestational age in spontaneously conceived pregnancies [20].”
  • The AIUM and ASUM base their antenatal care on the date of the last menstrual period.

    “More specifically, the AIUM and ASUM base their antenatal care on the date of the last menstrual period (LMP), while the AWMF, ISUOG and SOGC consider the crown–rump length (CRL) to be the most accurate method for determining gestational age in spontaneously conceived pregnancies [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, H. P.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, H. P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1973-10-06
Volume
4
Issue
5883
Pages
28-31
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1995527832
Cited by
392
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Glasgow
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
crown-rump length, fetal growth, first trimester, fetal maturity, sonar measurements, missed abortion, gestational age estimation
MeSH terms
Body Height, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Humans, Methods, Photography, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review