A review of the world's active seabird restoration projects
Abstract
Within the past several decades, seabird populations have been actively restored in locales where they were reduced or extirpated. Chick translocation, acoustic vocalization playbacks, and decoys are now used widely to lure breeding seabirds to restoration sites. In this first worldwide review of seabird restoration projects we evaluate the factors affecting project success or failure and recommend future directions for management. We identified 128 active restoration projects that were implemented to protect 47 seabird species in 100 locales spanning 14 countries since active restoration methods were pioneered in 1973. Active seabird restoration can achieve conservation goals for threatened and endangered species, and for species affected by anthropogenic impacts (e.g., oil spills, invasive species, fisheries). It also can be used to relocate populations from undesired breeding locales to more favorable locations, and to establish multiple breeding locations to reduce risks posed by catastrophic events. Active restoration can help to restore ecological processes, as large seabird colonies function to cycle marine nutrients to terrestrial ecosystems and create habitats for commensal species. Active restoration is especially appropriate where the original causes of decline are no longer working to suppress colony establishment and growth. Successful restoration efforts require careful planning and long‐term commitments. We introduce the different forms of active seabird restor…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach of hand- or captive-rearing chicks has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide.
“The approach has been used successfully in combination with translocation in the conservation of at least 11 seabird species worldwide [39]–[42].”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
Rearing birds in situ at future release sites has yielded high success rates in chick translocation projects with Procellariiformes.
“Rearing birds in situ at future release sites has yielded high success rates in chick translocation projects with Procellariiformes [42].”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
Efforts to restore or reinforce penguin populations appear to be scarce.
“However, efforts to restore or reinforce penguin populations appear to be scarce [42]”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains
Jones, H. P., Holmes, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Tershy, B. R., Kappes, P. J., Corkery, I., Aguirre-Muñoz, A., Armstrong, D. P., Bonnaud, E., Burbidge, A. A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521179113 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Self-citationPopulation Trend of the World’s Monitored Seabirds, 1950-2010
Paleczny, M., Hammill, E., Karpouzi, V., & Pauly, D. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129342 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Sherley, R. B., Waller, L. J., Strauss, V., Geldenhuys, D., Underhill, L. G., & Parsons, N. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110794 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, H. P., & Kress, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- National Audubon Society (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Holly P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11-14
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-9
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W1963826478
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- seabird colonies, colony relocation, seabird conservation, nutrient cycling, endangered seabirds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review