The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to conduct a meta‐review analysis of the knowledge management and intellectual capital literatures by investigating research productivity and conducting a citation analysis of individuals, institutions, and countries. The meta‐analysis focuses on the three leading peer‐reviewed, refereed journals in this area: Journal of Intellectual Capital, Journal of Knowledge Management, and Knowledge and Process Management. Results indicate that research productivity is exploding and that there are several leading authors and foundation publications that are referenced regularly. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · Cited by 560
Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry
Cabrita, M. D. R., & Bontis, N. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2008.019416 · Cited by 512
Self-citationExtended VAIC model: measuring intellectual capital components
Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2007) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930710830774 · Cited by 362
Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research
Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Benckendorff, P. (2019) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574 · Cited by 353
Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. K., Kamarul Zaman, M. D., & Samad, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.153 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Serenko, A., & Bontis, N.
- Venue
- Knowledge and Process Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-198
- ISSN
- 1092-4604 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1441
- OpenAlex
- W2156779040
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/kpm.203
- The paper
- Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2004). Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and Process Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
