The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended VAIC model: measuring intellectual capital components
Abstract
Purpose: In the intellectual capital (IC) literature, only a few studies have analyzed the relationships among the components of IC and organizational success. This study sets out to extend the current models to provide further insight into the role of IC in organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach: The study provides a theoretical discussion designed to push the measurement of IC into a more rigorous and comprehensive domain. Findings: As this is a theoretical paper, several hypotheses are presented for testing in the future. Practical implications: Recognizing the most influential elements of IC on organizational performance would help organizations to understand better the organizational capabilities they possess. In addition, the suggested extension would enable researchers to use archival resources to do cross‐company comparisons. Originality/value: The suggested extension to the VAIC model builds on several IC models that have not been well‐connected in the literature previously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization
Senge, P. M. (1991) · Performance + Instruction · doi:10.1002/pfi.4170300510 · Cited by 20,060
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
Caplan, R. S. (1992) · Harvard business review · Cited by 12,085
The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80925-9 · Cited by 8,192
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 7,979
Becker, G. S. (1983) · Cited by 6,708
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400201 · Cited by 4,107
Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975) · The Pacific Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1388226 · Cited by 3,876
Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations
Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998) · Performance Improvement · doi:10.1002/pfi.4140370713 · Cited by 3,749
Drucker, P. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780080938257 · Cited by 3,562
Cited by
Nimtrakoon, S. (2015) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-09-2014-0104 · Cited by 374
Appuhami, R., & Bhuyan, M. (2015) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj-04-2014-1022 · Cited by 100
Does intellectual capital help predict bankruptcy?
Cenciarelli, V. G., Greco, G., & Allegrini, M. (2018) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-03-2017-0047 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Capital
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-10-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 595-609
- ISSN
- 1469-1930 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965533218
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended VAIC model: measuring intellectual capital components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14691930710830774
- The paper
- Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2007). Extended VAIC model: measuring intellectual capital components. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710830774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
