Cited by 142Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaVestibular and auditory disordersHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

A novel diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube Dysfunction-The eustachian tube score

Schröder, Stefanie, Lehmann, Martin, Sauzet, Odile, Ebmeyer, Jörg, Sudhoff, Holger·2015·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis The purpose of this study was to introduce a new tool for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and as a follow-up tool for eustachian tube therapy using objective and subjective elements. Study design Combined, prospective, retrospective clinical study at a tertiary referral center. Methods Physical examination, history, tympanometry, audiometry, and tubomanometry as well as the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (EDTQ-7) were included as diagnostic tests. After initiating the eustachian tube score (ETS), we compared our results of healthy subjects to our data of patients with chronic obstructive ETD. In addition to ETS, an extended test ETS-7 was evaluated, which incorporated two additional items. Results The test-retest reliability revealed a correlation of 0.82 for the ETS and 0.87 for the ETS-7. ETS-7 receiver operating characteristic analysis, with reference to the EDTQ-7 score, resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64. Our analysis considered essential criteria of ETD as comparative tools, which were typical clinical complaints, and at least two of three conditions: a pathologic EDTQ-7, a type B/C tympanometry, and a positive independent expert evaluation. The corresponding AUC was 0.98. Chronic obstructive ETD was identified at a cutoff of 7, with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 96%, using the novel ETS-7. Conclusions ETS is a valid and reliable instrument in adult patients wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.24922

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schröder, S., Lehmann, M., Sauzet, O., Ebmeyer, J., & Sudhoff, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Sudhoff, Holger
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-12
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
703-708
ISSN
0023-852X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1506968556
Cited by
142
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
Eustachian tube dysfunction, ETDQ-7, tympanometry, tubomanometry, diagnostic accuracy, test-retest reliability, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Acoustic Impedance Tests, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Audiometry, Ear Diseases, Eustachian Tube, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review