Cited by 16Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineTracheal and airway disorders

Long-term in vivo electromechanical reshaping for auricular reconstruction in the New Zealand white rabbit model.

Open access
Badran, Karam W., Manuel, Cyrus T., Loy, Anthony Chin, Conderman, Christian, Yau, Yuk Yee, Lin, Jennifer, Tjoa, Tjoson, Su, Erica +2 more·2015·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To demonstrate the dosimetry effect of electromechanical reshaping (EMR) on cartilage shape change, structural integrity, cellular viability, and remodeling of grafts in an in vivo long-term animal model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal study. METHODS: A subperichondrial cartilaginous defect was created within the base of the pinna of 31 New Zealand white rabbits. Autologous costal cartilage grafts were electromechanically reshaped to resemble the rabbit auricular base framework and mechanically secured into the pinna base defect. Forty-nine costal cartilage specimens (four control and 45 experimental) successfully underwent EMR using a paired set of voltage-time combinations and survived for 6 or 12 weeks. Shape change was measured, and specimens were analyzed using digital imaging, tissue histology, and confocal microscopy with LIVE-DEAD viability assays. RESULTS: Shape change was proportional to charge transfer in all experimental specimens (P < .01) and increased with voltage. All experimental specimens contoured to the auricular base. Focal cartilage degeneration and fibrosis was observed where needle electrodes were inserted, ranging from 2.2 to 3.9 mm. The response to injury increased with increasing charge transfer and survival duration. CONCLUSIONS: EMR results in appropriate shape change in cartilage grafts with chondrocyte injury highly localized. These studies suggest that elements of auricular reconstruction may be feasible using EMR. Extended survival periods and further optimization of voltage-time pairs are necessary to evaluate the long-term effects and shape-change potential of EMR. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: NA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.25237

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electromechanical reshaping produced significant auricular changes with minimal injury, including promising applications to costal cartilage.

    “electromechanical reshaping produced significant auricular changes with minimal injury, including promising applications to costal cartilage.45–47”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Gandy JT Manuel CT Nguyen T Wong BJ The future of auricular repair: using EMR to develop a minimally invasive technique to build a human ear Military Health System Research Symposium Fort Lauderdale, FL August 18–21, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badran, K. W., Manuel, C. T., Loy, A. C., Conderman, C., Yau, Y. Y., Lin, J., Tjoa, T., Su, E., Protsenko, D., & Wong, B. J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Brian J. F.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-16
Volume
125
Issue
9
Pages
2058-2066
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W1912906004
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Defense Deployment Related Medical Research Program (DR090349)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-04-1-0101)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE019026, DC005572, DC 00170, RR 01192)
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC-46674)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
Keywords
ear reconstruction, cartilage grafts, costal cartilage, chondrocyte injury, cartilage fibrosis, cartilage degeneration, rabbit model, graft survival
MeSH terms
Animals, Cartilage, Disease Models, Animal, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Electrosurgery, Follow-Up Studies, Rabbits, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Time Factors, Microscopy, Confocal, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review