The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amelioration strategies for sodic soils: a review
Abstract
Sodic soils are characterized by the occurrence of excess sodium (Na+) to levels that can adversely affect soil structure and disturb availability of some nutrients to plants. Such changes ultimately affect crop growth and yield. There are large areas of the world that exist under sodic soils and need attention for efficient, inexpensive and environmentally feasible amelioration. Sodic soil amelioration involves increase in calcium (Ca 2+) on the cation exchange sites at the expense of Na+. The replaced Na+ together with excess soluble salts, if present, is removed from the root zone through infiltrating water as a result of excessive irrigations. Records nearly a century old reveal the use of water, crop, chemical amendment, electric current, and tillage as amelioration tools for such soils. Among the amelioration strategies, chemical amendments have an extensive usage. Owing to gradual increases in amendment cost in some parts of the world during the last two decades, this amelioration strategy has become cost‐intensive, particularly for the subsistence farmers in developing countries. In the meantime, phytoremediation with low initial investment has emerged as a potential substitute of chemical amelioration. Phytoremediation works through plant root action that helps dissolve native soil calcite (CaCO 3) of low solubility to supply adequate levels of Ca 2+ for an effective Na+−Ca 2+ exchange without the application of an amendment. Although significant progress has been achieved in improving amelioration methods, a great deal of work remains to analyse the economics of such methods with focus on (1) the long‐term sustainability of the amelioration projects and (2) the consequences of amelioration for the farmer himself, other growers and society as a whole. Computer modelling may help assess economic viability of different soil amelioration methods to extend results broadly to other similar locations. In addition, computer modelling to stimulate movement and reactions of salts in sodic soils has been a potentially useful complement to experimental data. However, such models need evaluation under field conditions. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
Cited by
Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils
Qadir, M., & Schubert, S. (2002) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.504 · Cited by 489
Self-citationImpact of salinity on soil microbial communities and the decomposition of maize in acidic soils
Wichern, J., Wichern, F., & Joergensen, R. G. (2006) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.001 · Cited by 465
Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics, and biochar: a review
Amini, S., Ghadiri, H., Chen, C., & Marschner, P. (2016) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1293-1 · Cited by 420
Zhang, H., Liu, X.-L., Zhang, R.-X., Yuan, H.-Y., Wang, M.-M., Yang, H.-Y., Ma, H.-Y., Liu, D., Jiang, C.-J., & Liang, Z.-W. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01580 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Qadir, M., Schubert, S., Ghafoor, A., & Murtaza, G.
- Venue
- Land Degradation & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-386
- ISSN
- 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-145X
- OpenAlex
- W2052350153
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.