The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options
Abstract
Despite numerous assessments of the sensitivity and resilience of drylands to degradation, there has been little research into the way affected communities innovate and adapt in response to land degradation. This paper shows how local and scientific knowledge can be combined to identify rangeland management strategies to reduce or adapt to land degradation. To achieve this, we have developed and applied a four‐stage social learning approach based on stakeholder participation in three degradation ‘hotspots’ in communal rangelands of the Kalahari, Botswana. This approach aims to collate, evaluate and apply both scientific and local knowledge on rangeland degradation and management options. First, current practice and possible management options were identified from the literature. Second, a series of semi‐structured interviews with rangeland users identified local knowledge of strategies to reduce and adapt to land degradation. Third, these options were discussed and evaluated with rangeland stakeholders in focus groups held across each study region. Finally, the outputs from these focus groups were used to produce rangeland assessment guides for each region that provided management options agreed to be locally relevant by both researchers and local stakeholders. The study found that the majority of strategies reported in the literature were not suitable for use by pastoralists in the Kalahari. However, many of the strategies suggested by stakeholders could only be applied effectively under common property regimes, giving impetus to the growing literature encouraging institutional reform to strengthen common property management regimes. The research stimulated a social learning process that combined knowledge from local stakeholders (both pastoralists and extension workers) with the scientific knowledge of researchers to provide a range of management options that could help land managers reduce or adapt to land degradation. By combining participatory research with insights from scientific literature in this way, more relevant results were provided than either approach could have achieved alone. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 · Cited by 3,136
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
(1989) · doi:10.3362/9781780440149 · Cited by 590
Local Knowledge in the Environment–Development Discourse: From dichotomies to situated knowledges
Nygren, A. (1999) · Critique of Anthropology · doi:10.1177/0308275x9901900304 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationFramework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction
Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Taranis, L., & Suchet‐Pearson, S. (2010) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x · Cited by 567
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M., & Tittonell, P. (2011) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006 · Cited by 474
Stringer, L. C., Dyer, J. C., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C., & Mkwambisi, D. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.002 · Cited by 351
Self-citationPARTICIPATORY INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT: WHAT CAN ECOLOGISTS AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES LEARN FROM EACH OTHER
Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Baker, T. R. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-0519.1 · Cited by 289
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Taylor, M. J.
- Venue
- Land Degradation & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-268
- ISSN
- 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-145X
- OpenAlex
- W2003261178
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 40.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ldr.777
- The paper
- Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2007). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options. Land Degradation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.