Cited by 9Academic Writing and Publishingscientometrics and bibliometrics researchDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

‘ AI ‐navigating’ or ‘ AI ‐sinking’? An analysis of verbs in research articles titles suspicious of containing AI ‐generated/assisted content

Open access
Comas‐Forgas, Ruben, Koulouris, Alexandros, Kouis, Dimitris·2025·Learned Publishing

Abstract

Our study investigates the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically generative AI technologies (GAI), on the linguistics of academic article titles. Triggered by suspicious of increased usage of specific verbs in article titles, this research hypothesizes that GAI tools may be influencing the language of scientific communication. To explore this hypothesis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis on the frequency and distribution of 15 selected verbs in research article titles, using data extracted from the SCOPUS database spanning 2015 to 2024. The methodology integrates qualitative observations with a bibliometric approach, examining the presence and trends of these verbs across multiple scientific disciplines. The findings reveal a marked increase in these verbs, pointing towards AI's involvement in title generation. We also explore document characteristics, such as disciplinary backgrounds and publication contexts, to gauge AI's impact on academic writing. Furthermore, the research attempts to quantify the extent of AI‐assisted title generation. Despite several limitations, this investigation paves the way for future studies to broaden the linguistic and database scope. It underscores the need for establishing AI usage standards in academic publishing, contributing valuable insights into the ongoing dialogue about AI's integration into academic writing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/leap.1647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An analysis of research article titles in Scopus (2015-2024) identified a sharp increase in AI-related terms such as unveiling, enhancing, and exploring, especially after 2023.

    “Finally, an analysis of research article titles in Scopus (2015-2024) identified a sharp increase in AI-related terms such as unveiling , enhancing , and exploring , especially after 2023, indicating a growing influence of generative AI on the phrasing of article titles (Comas-Forgas et al., 2025).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 9

Authors
Comas‐Forgas, R., Koulouris, A., & Kouis, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology University of the Balearic Islands Palma de Mallorca Spain
  • University of West Attica (GR)
  • Department of Archival, Library & Information Studies University of West Attica Egaleo Greece
Venue
Learned Publishing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4857
OpenAlex
W4404935189
Cited by
9
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Learned Publishing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2022‐141031NB‐I00)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
generative AI, research article titles, AI-generated content detection, academic writing, science communication, disciplinary differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review