The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones
Open accessAbstract
Ideophones are marked words that depict sensory imagery found in many of the world’s languages. They are noted for their special forms, distinct grammatical behaviour, rich sensory meanings, and interactional uses related to experience and evidentiality. This review surveys recent developments in ideophone research. Work on the semiotics of ideophones helps explain why they are marked and how they realise the depictive potential of speech. A true semantic typology of ideophone systems is coming within reach through a combination of language‐internal analyses and language‐independent elicitation tools. Documentation of ideophones in a wide variety of genres as well as sequential analysis of ideophone use in natural discourse leads to new insights about their interactional uses and about their relation to other linguistic devices like reported speech and grammatical evidentials. As the study of ideophones is coming of age, it sheds new light on what is possible and probable in human language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Levinson, S. C. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813313 · Cited by 5,137
Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach
Paivio, A. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,087
Podgorny, P., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422671 · Cited by 1,818
Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology
Leavitt, J., Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415546 · Cited by 1,612
Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001) · Cited by 1,570
Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation
Stivers, T. (2008) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351810701691123 · Cited by 1,408
Kim, K., Akatsuka, N., Iwasaki, S., & Strauss, S. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417739 · Cited by 1,383
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990) · Language · doi:10.2307/414729 · Cited by 1,228
(2013) · Practical Psychology · doi:10.4324/9781315009810-7 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013 · Cited by 494
Self-citationIconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review
Ortega, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280 · Cited by 123
Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols
Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150152 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Dingemanse, M.
- Venue
- Language and Linguistics Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 654-672
- ISSN
- 1749-818X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1573627288
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lnc3.361
- The paper
- Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
