The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions: Pluses and minuses of NH4+and NO3−
Open accessAbstract
Anthropogenic activities are altering total nutrient loads to many estuaries and freshwaters, resulting in high loads not only of total nitrogen (N), but in some cases, of chemically reduced forms, notably . Long thought to be the preferred form of N for phytoplankton uptake, may actually suppress overall growth when concentrations are sufficiently high. has been well known to be inhibitory or repressive for uptake and assimilation, but the concentrations of that promote vs. repress uptake, assimilation, and growth in different phytoplankton groups and under different growth conditions are not well understood. Here, we review N metabolism first in a “generic” eukaryotic cell, and the contrasting metabolic pathways and regulation of and when these substrates are provided individually under equivalent growth conditions. Then the metabolic interactions of these substrates are described when both are provided together, emphasizing the cellular challenge of balancing nutrient acquisition with photosynthetic energy balance in dynamic environments. Conditions under which dissipatory pathways such as dissimilatory / reduction to and photorespiration that may lead to growth suppression are highlighted. While more is known about diatoms, taxon-specific differences in and metabolism that may contribute to changes in phytoplankton community composition when the composition of the N pool changes are presented. These relationships have important implications for harmful algal blooms, development of nutrient criteria for management, and modeling of nutrient uptake by phytoplankton, particularly in conditions where eutrophication is increasing and the redox state of N loads is changing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804901 · Cited by 2,965
Self-citationEutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus
Heisler, J., Glibert, P. M., Burkholder, J. M., Anderson, D. M., Cochlan, W., Dennison, W. C., Dortch, Q., Gobler, C. J., Heil, C. A., Humphries, E., et al. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006 · Cited by 2,090
Self-citationMixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters
Burkholder, J. M., Glibert, P. M., & Skelton, H. M. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.010 · Cited by 590
Self-citationAcclimation and toxicity of high ammonium concentrations to unicellular algae
Collos, Y., & Harrison, P. J. (2014) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.006 · Cited by 517
Tracing the Thread of Plastid Diversity through the Tapestry of Life
Delwiche, C. F. (1999) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303291 · Cited by 429
Hockin, N. L., Mock, T., Mulholland, F., Kopriva, S., & Malin, G. (2012) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.111.184333 · Cited by 372
Can cryptophyte abundance trigger toxic Karlodinium veneficum blooms in eutrophic estuaries?
Adolf, J. E., Bachvaroff, T., & Place, A. R. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.003 · Cited by 118
KANA, T. M., GEIDER, R. J., & CRITCHLEY, C. (1997) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00857.x · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Cited by
Paerl, H. W., Scott, J. T., McCarthy, M. J., Newell, S. E., Gardner, W. S., Havens, K. E., Hoffman, D. K., Wilhelm, S. W., & Wurtsbaugh, W. A. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02575 · Cited by 718
University of California, D., Hobbs, J. A., Moyle, P. B., University of California, D., Fangue, N., University of California, D., Connon, R. E., & University of California, D. (2017) · San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science · doi:10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss2art2 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Glibert, P. M., Wilkerson, F. P., Dugdale, R. C., Raven, J. A., Dupont, C. L., Leavitt, P. R., Parker, A. E., Burkholder, J. M., & Kana, T. M.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-197
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1914782372
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 35.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions: Pluses and minuses of NH4+and NO3−. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lno.10203
- The paper
- Glibert, P. M., Wilkerson, F. P., Dugdale, R. C., Raven, J. A., Dupont, C. L., Leavitt, P. R., Parker, A. E., Burkholder, J. M., & Kana, T. M. (2016). Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions: Pluses and minuses of NH4+and NO3−. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.